Idaho Code
Idaho Code § 5-515 (2026)
Service of process on persons enumerated in preceding section — Personal service outside state.
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IClegislature.idaho.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Service of process on persons enumerated in preceding section — Personal service outside state.
Service of process upon any such person, firm, company, association or corporation who is subject to the jurisdiction of the courts of this state, as provided herein, may be made by personally serving the summons upon the defendant outside the state with the same force and effect as though summons had been personally served within this state.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1966–2022 · leading case: Dickinson Frozen Foods, Inc. v. J.R. Simplot Co., 434 P.3d 1275 (Idaho 2019).
Dickinson Frozen Foods, Inc. v. J.R. Simplot Co., 434 P.3d 1275 (Idaho 2019). “" However, the only acts committed by Yarmuth and Thompson were the filing of the complaint in the Washington litigation, and the sending of that complaint to NFCS-both acts that occurred in Washington.”
BBP Ass'n, Inc. v. Cessna Aircraft Co., 420 P.2d 134 (Idaho 1966). “” I.C. § 5-515. “Only causes of action arising from acts enumerated herein may be asserted against a defendant in an action in which jurisdiction over such defendant is based upon this section.”
Baker v. Baker, 603 P.2d 590 (Idaho 1979). “” I.C. § 5-515. Nothing in the procedures which here took place in any way *642 offends notions of fair notice and due process.”
Rainsdon v. Noriyuki (Bankr. D. Idaho 2022). “Service upon any person, firm, company, association or corporation who is subject to the jurisdiction of the courts of this state pursuant to the provisions of section 5-514 [Idaho’s Long- Arm Statute], Idaho Code, may be made in the manner provided in section 5-515, Idaho Code.”
— Idaho Code § 5-515(b) — 1 case
Dickinson Frozen Foods, Inc. v. J.R. Simplot Co., 434 P.3d 1275 (Idaho 2019). “" However, the only acts committed by Yarmuth and Thompson were the filing of the complaint in the Washington litigation, and the sending of that complaint to NFCS-both acts that occurred in Washington.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.