Idaho Code

Idaho Code § 5-515 (2026)

Service of process on persons enumerated in preceding section — Personal service outside state. 

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IClegislature.idaho.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Service of process on persons enumerated in preceding section — Personal service outside state. 

Service of process upon any such person, firm, company, association or corporation who is subject to the jurisdiction of the courts of this state, as provided herein, may be made by personally serving the summons upon the defendant outside the state with the same force and effect as though summons had been personally served within this state.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1966–2022 · leading case: Dickinson Frozen Foods, Inc. v. J.R. Simplot Co., 434 P.3d 1275 (Idaho 2019).
Dickinson Frozen Foods, Inc. v. J.R. Simplot Co., 434 P.3d 1275 (Idaho 2019). “" However, the only acts committed by Yarmuth and Thompson were the filing of the complaint in the Washington litigation, and the sending of that complaint to NFCS-both acts that occurred in Washington.”
BBP Ass'n, Inc. v. Cessna Aircraft Co., 420 P.2d 134 (Idaho 1966). · cites it 2× “” I.C. § 5-515. “Only causes of action arising from acts enumerated herein may be asserted against a defendant in an action in which jurisdiction over such defendant is based upon this section.”
Baker v. Baker, 603 P.2d 590 (Idaho 1979). · cites it 2× “” I.C. § 5-515. Nothing in the procedures which here took place in any way *642 offends notions of fair notice and due process.”
Rainsdon v. Noriyuki (Bankr. D. Idaho 2022). · cites it 2× “Service upon any person, firm, company, association or corporation who is subject to the jurisdiction of the courts of this state pursuant to the provisions of section 5-514 [Idaho’s Long- Arm Statute], Idaho Code, may be made in the manner provided in section 5-515, Idaho Code.”
— Idaho Code § 5-515(b) — 1 case
Dickinson Frozen Foods, Inc. v. J.R. Simplot Co., 434 P.3d 1275 (Idaho 2019). “" However, the only acts committed by Yarmuth and Thompson were the filing of the complaint in the Washington litigation, and the sending of that complaint to NFCS-both acts that occurred in Washington.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.