Idaho Code
Idaho Code

Idaho Code § 50-1027 (2026)

Revenue bonds — Short title. 

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IClegislature.idaho.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Revenue bonds — Short title. 

The following fifteen (15) sections may be cited as the Revenue Bond Act.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1991–2018 · leading case: Loomis v. City of Hailey, 807 P.2d 1272 (Idaho 1991).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Loomis v. City of Hailey, 807 P.2d 1272 (Idaho 1991). · cites it 4× “I.C. § 50-1027. The connection fees imposed by Ordinance 495 are based upon the replacement value minus the remaining bond principal and cumulative unfunded depreciation.”
City of Chubbuck v. City of Pocatello, 899 P.2d 411 (Idaho 1995). · cites it 2× “I.C. §§ 50-1027 to - 1042. The grant of authority provided by the Revenue Bond Act provides that: Any city acquiring, constructing, reconstructing, improving, bettering or extending any works pursuant to this act, shall manage such works in the most efficient manner consistent…”
Viking Constr., Inc. v. Hayden Lake Irrigation Dist., 233 P.3d 118 (Idaho 2010). · cites it 2× “8, § 3 allows municipalities to impose rates and charges to provide revenue for public works projects, and pursuant to this section of the Constitution, the Idaho legislature enacted the Idaho Revenue Bond Act, codified at I.”
N. Idaho Bldg. Contractors Ass'n v. City of Hayden, 432 P.3d 976 (Idaho 2018). · cites it 2× “codified at I.C. § 50-1027 through § 50-1042," Manwaring , 162 Idaho at 768 , 405 P.”
North Idaho Bldg. Contractors Ass'n v. City of Hayden, 343 P.3d 1086 (Idaho 2015). · cites it 4× “The district court also held that the $2,280 fee was authorized by Idaho Code section 50-1030(f), which is part of the Idaho Revenue Bond Act, I.C. §§ 50-1027 to 50-1042. The relevant portion of Idaho Code section 50-1030 states: In addition to the powers which it may now have,…”
Lewiston Indep. Sch. Dist. 1 v. City of Lewiston, 264 P.3d 907 (Idaho 2011). · cites it 2× “The only argument that the City makes is that the storm-water fee is valid under the Revenue Bond Act, I.C. § 50-1027, et seq. That issue, however, is not before this Court because the City did not proceed under the Revenue Bond Act.”
No ID Bldg Cont Assoc v. City of Hayden (Idaho 2018). · cites it 2× “City of 7 Pocatello, 115 Idaho 502, 503 , 768 P.2d 765, 766 (1988).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.