Idaho Code
Idaho Code § 55-908 (2026)
Fraud is a question of fact.
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IClegislature.idaho.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Fraud is a question of fact.
In all cases arising under the provisions of chapters 5 to 9 inclusive, of this title, the question of fraudulent intent is one of fact, and not of law; nor can any transfer or charge be adjudged fraudulent solely on the ground that it was not made for a valuable consideration.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1955–2012 · leading case: In re Hall, 464 B.R. 896 (Bankr. D. Idaho 2012).
In re Hall, 464 B.R. 896 (Bankr. D. Idaho 2012). “See Idaho Code § 55-908 . B. Intention to Defraud Creditors The law tolerates a certain amount of pre-bankruptcy exemption planning.”
Mohar v. McLelland Lumber Co., 501 P.2d 722 (Idaho 1972). “I.C. § 55-908; Snell v. Prescott, 48 Idaho 783 , 285 P.”
Sur. Life Ins. v. Rose Chapel Mortuary, Inc., 514 P.2d 594 (Idaho 1973). “” The intent required by Idaho Code § 55-906 is described in Idaho Code § 55-908 which provides: “55-908.”
Head v. Crone, 279 P.2d 1064 (Idaho 1955). “Such concept cannot apply here because, a mortgage cannot be adjudged fraudulent solely on the ground that it was not made for a valuable consideration, I.C. § 55-908; further, the question of whether a transfer is void as being in fraud of creditors is one which may only be…”
Siegel Mobile Home Grp., Inc. v. Bowen, 757 P.2d 1250 (Idaho Ct. App. 1988). “I.C. § 55-908; see also Gish v. Unruh, 160 Kan.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.