Idaho Code
Idaho Code

Idaho Code § 6-1006 (2026)

Stay of other court proceedings in interest of hearing before panel. 

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IClegislature.idaho.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Stay of other court proceedings in interest of hearing before panel. 

During said thirty (30) day period neither party shall commence or prosecute litigation involving the issues submitted to the panel and the district or other courts having jurisdiction of any pending such claims shall stay proceedings in the interest of the conduct of such proceedings before the panel.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1986–2023 · leading case: Rudd v. Merritt, 66 P.3d 230 (Idaho 2003).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Rudd v. Merritt, 66 P.3d 230 (Idaho 2003). · cites it 17× “” Idaho Code § 6-1006 (1998). Because the statute of limitations is tolled during the period from the commencement of the prelitigation screening proceedings until thirty days after they are concluded, James v.”
Moss v. Bjornson, 765 P.2d 676 (Idaho 1988). · cites it 12× “— During said thirty (30) day period neither party shall commence or prosecute litigation involving the issues submitted to the panel and the district or other courts having jurisdiction of any pending such claims shall stay proceedings in the interest of the conduct of such…”
Taylor v. Chamberlain, D.O., 302 P.3d 35 (Idaho 2013). · cites it 12× “He contended that he thought the litigation would be automatically stayed pursuant to Idaho Code section 6-1006, which would have given him more time to serve the summons and complaint on the Defendants, and that he was unaware of this Court’s decision to the contrary in Rudd v.”
James v. Buck, 727 P.2d 1136 (Idaho 1986). · cites it 4× “I.C. § 6-1006. I.C. § 6-1011 limits the time in which a prelitigation panel has to hear a dispute and issue findings.”
Moss v. Bjornson, 765 P.2d 676 (Idaho 1988). · cites it 12× “Idaho Code § 6-1006 provides: Stay of other court proceedings in interest of hearing before panel.”
Winterfeld v. Gateway Transitional Care Ctr. (D. Idaho 2023). · cites it 2× “Winterfeld contends the requirement to file with a prelitigation panel is inapplicable to her case because her claims “are not claims for the failure to provide medical, nursing, or health care services.” (Dkt. 13 at p.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.