Idaho Code
Idaho Code § 6-1101 (2026)
Legislative purpose.
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IClegislature.idaho.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Legislative purpose.
The legislature finds that the sport of skiing is practiced by a large number of citizens of this state and also attracts a large number of nonresidents, significantly contributing to the economy of Idaho. Since it is recognized that there are inherent risks in the sport of skiing which should be understood by each skier and which are essentially impossible to eliminate by the ski area operation, it is the purpose of this chapter to define those areas of responsibility and affirmative acts for which ski area operators shall be liable for loss, damage or injury, and to define those risks which the skier expressly assumes and for which there can be no recovery.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1990–2025 · leading case: Northcutt v. Sun Valley Co., 787 P.2d 1159 (Idaho 1990).
Northcutt v. Sun Valley Co., 787 P.2d 1159 (Idaho 1990). “In reaching a decision on these issues we are required to construe I.C. §§ 6-1101 through 6-1109 (the Act), which define the responsibilities and liabilities of skiers and ski area operators.”
Lopez v. Ski Apache Resort, 836 P.2d 648 (N.M. Ct. App. 1992). “, Idaho Code §§ 6-1101 through 6-1109 (1990 & Supp.”
Long v. Bogus Basin Recreational, Ass'n, 869 P.2d 230 (Idaho 1994). “Bogus Basin moved for summary judgment, alleging there was no genuine issue as to any material fact and that Bogus Basin was entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law based on I.C. § 6-1101 et. seq. (the “skier statute”).”
Breanne Bennett v. Hidden Valley Golf & Ski, Inc., 318 F.3d 868 (8th Cir. 2003). “§ 33-44-101; Idaho Code § 6-1101 . In California a defendant has “no legal duty to eliminate (or protect a plaintiff against) risks inherent in the sport itself.”
Davis v. Sun Valley Ski Educ. Found., Inc., 941 P.2d 1301 (Idaho 1997). “Defendants requested that the trial court grant them summary judgment on the ground that I.C. §§ 6-1101 through 6-1106 (the act), which define the responsibilities and liabilities of skiers and ski area operators, bars Davis from recovering for her injuries.”
Withers v. Bogus Basin Recreational Ass'n, 156 P.3d 579 (Idaho 2007). “This case involves the interpretation and application of Idaho Code §§ 6-1101 et seq. (the “Ski Area Liability Act”) arising from an accident suffered by Helga Withers at a ski area owned by Bogus Basin Recreational Association, Inc.”
Halpern v. Wheeldon, 890 P.2d 562 (Wyo. 1995). “Many of our sister states’ inherent risk statutes provide nonexclusive lists of risks which the Legislatures have determined are inherent to certain activities.”
Matthew Shukoski & Darlene Ritchie v. Indianhead Mountain Resort, Inc., 166 F.3d 848 (6th Cir. 1999). “135 (1983); CRS §§ 33-44-101 to -114 (West 1996); Idaho Code §§ 6-1101 to -1109; Mass. Gen.”
Collins v. Schweitzer, Inc., 21 F.3d 1491 (9th Cir. 1994). “In 1979, the Idaho legislature enacted a law entitled “Responsibilities and Liabilities of Skiers and Ski Area Operators,” Idaho Code §§ 6-1101 through 6-1109 (the “Act”).”
Collins v. Schweitzer, Inc., 774 F. Supp. 1253 (D. Idaho 1991). “That issue is whether or not the Idaho Responsibilities and Liabilities of Skiers and Ski Area Operators Act ( Idaho Code §§ 6-1101 to 6-1109 (1990), the “skier statute” or “Act”) applies to shield Schweitzer (and therefore NASTAR) from liability.”
Milus v. Sun Valley Co. (Idaho 2023). “See I.C. §§ 6-1101 through 6-1109. Idaho Code section 6-1103 is titled, “Duties of ski area operators with respect to ski areas,” and contains ten subsections.”
Vaughan v. Gateway Park, LLC (Idaho 2025). “Gateway filed a motion to dismiss the complaint, arguing that Vaughan’s claims were foreclosed by: (1) the online liability waiver she signed; and (2) the Responsibilities and Liabilities of Skiers and Ski Area Operators Act, set forth in Idaho Code sections 6-1101 through…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.