Idaho Code

Idaho Code § 6-314 (2026)

Sufficiency of evidence — Defenses. 

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IClegislature.idaho.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sufficiency of evidence — Defenses. 

On the trial of any proceeding for any forcible entry or forcible detainer, the plaintiff shall only be required to show, in addition to the forcible entry or forcible detainer complained of, that he was peaceably in the actual possession at the time of the forcible entry, or was entitled to the possession at the time of the forcible detainer. The defendant may show in his defense that he or his ancestors, or those whose interest in such premises he claims, have been in the quiet possession thereof for the space of one whole year together next before the commencement of the proceedings, and that his interest therein is not then ended or determined; and such showing is a bar to the proceedings.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1975–1975 · leading case: Loomis v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., 544 P.2d 299 (Idaho 1975).
Loomis v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., 544 P.2d 299 (Idaho 1975). · cites it 20× “Therefore, the court ruled that this constituted a bar to the action pursuant to I.C. § 6-314. [8] Secondly, the court ruled that appellants could not join in one action (as they had done) a claim for forcible detainer, with claims for ejectment and quiet title.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.