Idaho Code
Idaho Code

Idaho Code § 61-624 (2026)

Rescission or change of orders. 

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IClegislature.idaho.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Rescission or change of orders. 

The commission may at any time, upon notice to the public utility affected, and after opportunity to be heard as provided in the case of complaints, rescind, alter or amend any order or decision made by it. Any order rescinding, altering or amending a prior order or decision shall, when served upon the public utility affected, have the same effect as is herein provided for original orders or decisions.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11 cases, 1950–1986 · leading case: Utah Power & Light Co. v. Idaho Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 685 P.2d 276 (Idaho 1984).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Utah Power & Light Co. v. Idaho Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 685 P.2d 276 (Idaho 1984). · cites it 28× “ORDERS SET ASIDE ON APPEAL UP & L argues that I.C. §§ 61-624 and 61-629 give the PUC the authority to grant monetary relief to a utility when a PUC order is set aside by this Court on appeal.”
Hayden Pines Water Co. v. Idaho Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 723 P.2d 875 (Idaho 1986). · cites it 24× “Accordingly, we set aside the decision of the Commission on this issue without holding that it is either valid or invalid, and remand the decision to the agency for further determinations pursuant to I.C. § 61-624 on the question of the effective date of the pertinent part of…”
Intermountain Gas Co. v. Idaho Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 540 P.2d 775 (Idaho 1975). · cites it 5× “We hold that if these adjustments to working capital have caused any of Intermountain’s test year data to be inaccurate that Intermountain has a right to request further proceedings under the authority of I.C. §§ 61-624, 61-629, to introduce evidence adjusting the data.”
Utah-Idaho Sugar Co. v. Intermountain Gas Co., 597 P.2d 1058 (Idaho 1979). · cites it 2× “In case the order of the commission is set aside the commission, upon its own motion or upon motion of any of the parties, may alter or amend the order appealed from to meet the objections of the court in the manner prescribed in section 61-624.”
Citizens Utils. Co. v. Idaho Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 579 P.2d 110 (Idaho 1978). · cites it 2× “In case the order of the commission is set aside the commission, upon its own motion or upon motion of any of the parties, may alter or amend the order appealed from to meet the objections of the court in the manner prescribed in section 61-624. 2 . 61-307. Schedules — Change in…”
Idaho State Bar Ass'n v. Idaho Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 637 P.2d 1168 (Idaho 1981). · cites it 2× “In case the order of the commission is set aside or set aside in part, the commission, upon its own motion or upon motion of any of the parties, may alter or amend the order appealed from to meet the objections of the court in the manner prescribed in section 61-624, Idaho…”
Joy v. Winstead, 215 P.2d 291 (Idaho 1950). · cites it 2× “Railroad Comm, of California, D.C., 227 F. 708 , they seem concerned only with appeals and do not by citation or argument rest upon the Company not seeking a stay from the Commission under Section 61-624 or 626, I.”
Cambridge Tel. Co. v. Pine Tel. Sys., Inc., 712 P.2d 576 (Idaho 1985). · cites it 2× “The commission may 2 “rescind, alter or amend,” I.C. § 61-624, the certificate of convenience and necessity previously issued for an unserved area upon a showing that the “public convenience and necessity” does not require the extension, and the commission may “make such order…”
Idaho Power Co. v. Idaho Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 703 P.2d 707 (Idaho 1985). · cites it 2× “Upon the hearing the Supreme Court shall enter judgment, either affirming or setting aside or setting aside in part the order of the commission. In case the order of the commission is set aside or set aside in part, the commission, upon its own motion or upon motion of any of…”
Associated Pac. Movers, Housemovers, Inc. v. Rowley, 551 P.2d 618 (Idaho 1976). · cites it 8× “On appeal, the appellants challenge the award of the housemoving permit on the ground that Rowley’s second application and the hearing thereon amounted to a collateral attack on the first order of denial and thereby violated I.C. § 61-625, which provides: “All orders and…”
Mountain States Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Jones, 267 P.2d 634 (Idaho 1954). “Sections 61-624 to 61-626 Idaho Code. If the Commission would have suspended its rates, the court herein has done no more.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.