Appeal to supreme court — Notice of appeal — Matters reviewable on appeal — Extent of review — Record on appeal.
After a petition for reconsideration is denied, or, if the petition is granted, then after the rendition of the decision on reconsideration, the state of Idaho or any party aggrieved may appeal to the supreme court from any order of the public utilities commission by filing a notice of appeal and serving the same in the manner provided by the rules of the supreme court. Upon the payment of the fee therefor, the secretary of the public utilities commission shall prepare, certify, and deliver to the clerk of the supreme court copies of the transcript of the testimony and the relevant documents from the commission files as required under rules adopted by the supreme court for its appeals and shall also certify and deposit with the clerk of the supreme court the original exhibits from that proceeding.
Notes of Decisions
Miles v. Idaho Power Co. Ex Rel. Evans, 778 P.2d 757 (Idaho 1989).
· cites it 8× “Subsequently, after a commission ruling, Miles could then bring an appeal to this Court pursuant to I.C. § 61-627, and raise the constitutional issues.”
United States v. Utah Power & Light Co., 570 P.2d 1353 (Idaho 1977).
· cites it 4× “We do not question the efficacy of past rate increases that have not been appealed within the statutory period of limitations set forth in I.C. § 61-627. We only hold that the requirements of I.”
Eagle Water Co. v. Idaho Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 940 P.2d 1133 (Idaho 1997).
· cites it 6× “Therefore, Eagle Water’s cross-petition for reconsideration was not timely as a petition for reconsideration and was necessarily limited in scope to those issues raised in United’s petition for reconsideration.”
Utah Power & Light Co. v. Idaho Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 685 P.2d 276 (Idaho 1984).
· cites it 4× “UP & L argues that to make the effectiveness of an appeal hinge upon the granting of a discretionary stay conflicts with its basic due process rights and with I.C. § 61-627 which grants any aggrieved party a direct right of appeal to the Supreme Court.”
Idaho Underground Water Users Ass'n v. Idaho Power Co., 404 P.2d 859 (Idaho 1965).
· cites it 2× “§ 61-626 and § 61-627 matters not raised in the petition for rehearing will not be considered by this court; and further that appellant's petition for rehearing failed to present any issue as to the sufficiency of the findings.”
Idaho Power Co. v. Idaho Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 582 P.2d 720 (Idaho 1978).
· cites it 2× “On April 15, 1976, Idaho Power perfected this appeal from the above orders pursuant to I.C. § 61-627. Intervenor FMC Corporation, as party respondent to the proceedings, also filed a brief.”
Joy v. Winstead, 215 P.2d 291 (Idaho 1950).
· cites it 2× “The California statute thus provides: “No court of this State (except the Supreme Court to the extent herein specified) shall have jurisdiction to review, reverse, correct or annul any order or decision of the commission, or to suspend or delay the execution or operation…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.