Audit of claims.
It is the duty of the state board of examiners to examine all claims, except salaries and compensation of officers fixed by law, and except fixed appropriations for principal and interest of the public bonded debt, and except claims against the state already presented to the board and favorably reported by it to the legislature for passage. The board may approve or disapprove any claim or demand against the state, or any item thereof, or may recommend a less amount in payment of the whole, or any item thereof, and a decision of a majority of the members shall stand as the decision of the board. But no claim shall be examined, considered or acted upon by said board, unless the state controller, as secretary of the state board of examiners, shall have indorsed thereon the certificates required to be made by him by section 67-2014, Idaho Code, and unless receipted vouchers are filed therewith showing the payment of all items for which reimbursement is asked.
Expenditures for the ordinary operations of state government, for which appropriations have been made, need not be examined or reviewed by the board of examiners.
Notes of Decisions
Westover v. Idaho Counties Risk Mgmt. Prog., 430 P.3d 1284 (Idaho 2018).
· cites it 2× “If sufficient funds are not available in the budget of the state agency, the expenses shall be considered a claim governed by the provisions of section 67-2018, Idaho Code. If sufficient funds are not available in the budget of the political subdivision, the expenses shall be…”
Jewett v. Williams, 369 P.2d 590 (Idaho 1962).
· cites it 4× “§ 67-1008 requires all persons having claims against the state to exhibit them with supporting evidence “to the auditor, to be audited, settled and allowed by the board of examiners * * I.C. § 67-2018 makes it the duty of the “board of examiners to examine,” and that it “may…”
Padgett v. Williams, 348 P.2d 944 (Idaho 1960).
· cites it 2× “* * Idaho Code, § 67-2018, makes it the duty of the state board of examiners to examine all claims and that it may approve or disapprove any claim or demand against the state, or any item thereof.”
Westover v. Idaho Counties Risk Mgmt Prog. (Idaho 2018).
· cites it 2× “If sufficient funds are not available in the budget of the state agency, the expenses shall be considered a claim governed by the provisions of section 67-2018, Idaho Code. If sufficient funds are not available in the budget of the political subdivision, the expenses shall be…”
Westover v. Idaho Counties Risk Mgmt (Idaho 2018).
· cites it 2× “If sufficient funds are not available in the budget of the state agency, the expenses shall be considered a claim governed by the provisions of section 67-2018, Idaho Code. If sufficient funds are not available in the budget of the political subdivision, the expenses shall be…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.