Idaho Code
Idaho Code § 67-513 (2026)
Repeal of penal law.
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IClegislature.idaho.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Repeal of penal law.
The repeal of any law creating a criminal offense does not constitute a bar to the prosecution and punishment of an act already committed in violation of the law so repealed, unless the intention to bar such prosecution and punishment is expressly declared in the repealing act.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1955–2014 · leading case: State v. Morris, 954 P.2d 681 (Idaho Ct. App. 1998).
State v. Morris, 954 P.2d 681 (Idaho Ct. App. 1998). “§ 18-1403 effective July 1, 1992, without a saving clause and without indicating which maximum sentence should be applied during the transitional period.”
State v. Nichols, 718 P.2d 1261 (Idaho Ct. App. 1986). “As noted, the Legislature did not simply repeal I.”
United States v. United States Coin & Currency, 401 U.S. 715 (1971). “Laws § 1-11 (1968); Idaho: Idaho Code § 67-513 (1947); Illinois: Ill.”
State v. Webb, 279 P.2d 634 (Idaho 1955). “” Section 67-513, I.C. In the case now before the Court, it is to be noted all of the statutory provisions’ repealed and those simultaneously re-enacted are not the same, but as far as this case is concerned, the statute under consideration makes it unlawful for any person who…”
State v. Cody William Parmer (Idaho Ct. App. 2014). “Still, the district court denied Parmer’s motion to dismiss the failure to register charge, relying upon Idaho Code § 67-513 . This section provides that the repeal of a criminal law does not constitute a bar to the prosecution and punishment of an act committed in violation of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.