Existing merit systems and personnel systems.
The personnel system administered by the division of human resources created by this act is hereby designated as the "merit system," "civil service system" or "personnel system" as may be required by any other section of the Idaho Code for the administration of any department covered by this act; and all laws in conflict in whole or in part with the provisions of this act are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict or inconsistency, provided, however, that in the implementation of this act those portions of chapter 35, title 67, Idaho Code, requiring approval of the administrator of the division of financial management of increase in compensation for any state employee, shall not be held to apply to employees covered under this act, but all departments whose salaries and administrative costs come from state appropriations shall prepare and file the reports and estimates in the office of the administrator of the division of financial management in accordance with chapter 35, title 67, Idaho Code, and personnel compensation thereunder shall not be effective until approved as being within the state budget limitations of the respective department.
Notes of Decisions
Lockhart v. Dep't of Fish & Game, 828 P.2d 1299 (Idaho 1992).
· cites it 2× “2d at 915 (emphasis added); see also I.C. § 67-5304(2). Moreover, we also held that “the Personnel Commission Act conflicts with the APA to the extent that it provides the procedure for hearings and for appeals to the district court under the act.”
Sheets v. Idaho Dep't of Health & Welfare, 753 P.2d 1257 (Idaho 1988).
· cites it 2× “is entitled to judicial review under this Act.” As Judge Burnett noted in his special concurrence in Stroud : “The APA is displaced by the Personnel Commission statutes only to the extent of conflict.”
— Idaho Code § 67-5304(2) — 3 cases
Lockhart v. Dep't of Fish & Game, 828 P.2d 1299 (Idaho 1992).
“2d at 915 (emphasis added); see also I.C. § 67-5304(2). Moreover, we also held that “the Personnel Commission Act conflicts with the APA to the extent that it provides the procedure for hearings and for appeals to the district court under the act.”
Sheets v. Idaho Dep't of Health & Welfare, 753 P.2d 1257 (Idaho 1988).
“is entitled to judicial review under this Act.” As Judge Burnett noted in his special concurrence in Stroud : “The APA is displaced by the Personnel Commission statutes only to the extent of conflict.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.