Idaho Code

Idaho Code § 7-208 (2026)

Extent of review.

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IClegislature.idaho.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Extent of review.

The review upon this writ cannot be extended further than to determine whether the inferior tribunal, board or officer has regularly pursued the authority of such tribunal, board or officer.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 8 cases, 1954–1987 · leading case: Marks v. Vehlow, 671 P.2d 473 (Idaho 1983).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Marks v. Vehlow, 671 P.2d 473 (Idaho 1983). · cites it 8× “I.C. § 7-208. Section 7-208 provides: "The review upon this writ cannot be extended further than to determine whether the inferior tribunal, board or officer has regularly pursued the authority of such tribunal, board or officer.”

In Re Petition of Idaho State Fed. of Labor (Afl), 272 P.2d 707 (Idaho 1954). · cites it 8× “" Section 7-208, I.C., authorizes shortening of the return time specified therein; hence, due to the exigencies of the situation, by minute entry May 10, Record Book 10, page 164, we ordered petitioners to serve the Attorney General and Secretary of State with, and notify…”

Mathison v. Felton, 408 P.2d 457 (Idaho 1965). · cites it 4× “I.C. § 7-208 provides: "The review upon this writ can not be extended further than to determine whether the inferior tribunal, board or officer has regularly pursued the authority of such tribunal, board or officer.”

Berry v. Dist. Court of the Third Jud. Dist. of the State of Idaho Ex Rel. Cnty. of Ada, 428 P.2d 519 (Idaho 1967). · cites it 8× “The record of Yancey's testimony sustains these findings in all material aspects. The record fully justifies the trial court's conclusions inherent in the recitation of facts that "[T]he impressions were taken under the supervision and direction of Berry.”

In Re Contempt of Reeves, 733 P.2d 795 (Idaho Ct. App. 1987). · cites it 2× “Richards, supra ; I.C. § 7-208 (review limited to determination whether inferior tribunal "regularly pursued [its] authority").”

Bandelin v. Quinlan, 499 P.2d 557 (Idaho 1972). · cites it 2× “Jones, 91 Idaho 578 , 428 P.2d 497 (1967); 17 Am.Jur.2d, Contempt § 6 (1964).”

Electors of Big Butte Area v. State Bd. of Educ., 308 P.2d 225 (Idaho 1957). “” § 7-208, I.C. The legislature provided for an “appeal”.”

Reeves v. Reynolds, 733 P.2d 795 (Idaho Ct. App. 1987). · cites it 2× “Richards, supra; I.C. § 7-208 (review limited to determination whether inferior tribunal “regularly pursued [its] authority”).”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.