Idaho Code
Idaho Code § 7-911 (2026)
Confirmation of an award.
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IClegislature.idaho.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 25
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1985–2026 · leading case: Wolfe v. Farm Bureau Ins., 913 P.2d 1168 (Idaho 1996).
Wolfe v. Farm Bureau Ins., 913 P.2d 1168 (Idaho 1996). “Idaho Code § 7-911 provides: Upon application of a party, the court shall confirm an award, unless within the time limits hereinafter imposed grounds are urged for vacating or modifying or correcting the award, in which case the court shall proceed as provided in sections 7-912…”
Driver v. SI CORP., 80 P.3d 1024 (Idaho 2003). “Idaho Code §§ 7-911 and 7-912 require that grounds for vacating an award must be “urged” to the district court within 90 days of the entry of the award.”
Martel v. Bulotti, 65 P.3d 192 (Idaho 2003). “Whether the decision of an architect constitutes an arbitration award for purposes of I.C. § 7-911 presents an issue of first impression in Idaho.”
Parsons v. Mut. of Enumclaw Ins., 152 P.3d 614 (Idaho 2007). “Under I.C. § 7-911, we have allowed attorney fees for an action to confirm or enforce an arbitration award but not for the underlying arbitration.”
Barbee v. WMA Sec., Inc., 146 P.3d 657 (Idaho 2006). “Clearly, the term "sue," like the term "action," requires the "filing of a complaint with the court, which may be denominated as a complaint, petition or application.”
Storey Constr. Inc. v. Hanks, 224 P.3d 468 (Idaho 2009). “There is no basis for asserting that the counterclaim in the arbitration proceeding must also include claims then unknown to the party asserting the counterclaim.”
W. Indus. & Env't Servs., Inc. v. Kaldveer Assocs., Inc., 887 P.2d 1048 (Idaho 1994). “I.C. § 7-911. Thereafter, § 7-914 provides in pertinent part that, “[UJpon the granting of an order confirming, modifying or correcting an award, judgment or decree shall be entered in conformity therewith and be enforced as any other judgment or decree.”
Harrison v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, 233 P.3d 132 (Idaho 2010). “On April 25, 2008, Lloyd’s filed an application “for an order confirming the arbitration award rendered by the parties chosen arbitrator on January 25, 2008, pursuant to Idaho Code § 7-911 .” Idaho Code § 7-911 provides: “Upon application of a party, the court shall confirm an…”
Bald, Fat & Ugly, LLC v. Keane, 303 P.3d 166 (Idaho 2013). “Idaho Code section 7-911 provides for an order confirming an arbitration award, 4 and Idaho Code section 7-914 provides for then obtaining a judgment upon that award.”
Landmark v. Mader Agency, Inc., 878 P.2d 773 (Idaho 1994). “[1] Rather, the district court remanded the award to the arbitrator for modification or correction under I.”
Am. & Foreign Ins. Co. v. Reichert, 94 P.3d 699 (Idaho 2004). “DID THE DISTRICT COURT ERR IN STAYING THE CONFIRMATION OF THE ARBITRATION AWARD PENDING DETERMINATION OF THE OFFSET AMOUNT? Upon application of a party, the court shall confirm an arbitrator’s award, unless within the time limits grounds are urged for vacating, modifying, or…”
Deelstra v. Hagler, 188 P.3d 864 (Idaho 2008). “He contends that any such modification was improper because Hagler filed no motion to modify, vacate or correct the award as required by I.C. § 7-911. 3 In addition, he notes Hagler failed to assert any grounds for modification pursuant to I.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.