Idaho Code
Idaho Code § 72-1010 (2026)
Receipt of funds.
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IClegislature.idaho.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Receipt of funds.
The commission may adopt appropriate rules in order to receive federal funds under federal criminal reparation and compensation acts, or to receive grants, gifts or donations from any source.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15
cases, 1953–1973 · leading case: Adam v. Titan Equip. Supply Corp., 470 P.2d 409 (Idaho 1970).
Adam v. Titan Equip. Supply Corp., 470 P.2d 409 (Idaho 1970). “The respondent answered the allegations of the complaint and by one of its affirmative defenses alleged that under the provisions of I.C. § 72-1010, the respondent was a statutory employer of the decedent and that the action should be dismissed.”
Clearwater Timber Prot. Ass'n v. Dist. Court, 369 P.2d 571 (Idaho 1962). “The District, the Wooderchak youth's direct employer, is of statutory creation; the State Forester, as authorized by I.C. § 38-105 created this district and appointed its Chief Fire Warden.”
Miller v. FMC Corp., 471 P.2d 550 (Idaho 1970). “The court concluded that there was no issue of material fact between the parties and that FMC and Cooper Brothers were statutory employers under I.C. § 72-1010. The court held,' therefore, that appellant was precluded from bringing a negligence action by the Workmen’s…”
Brown v. Arrington Const. Co., 262 P.2d 789 (Idaho 1953). “§§ 72-1010, 72-1011 and 72-1015. Especially § 72-1010, referring to "employer": *801 "* * * It includes the owner or lessee of premises, or other person who is virtually the proprietor or operator of the business there carried on, but who, by reason of there being an independent…”
Clawson v. Gen. Ins. Co. of Am., 412 P.2d 597 (Idaho 1966). “In support of this contention both of them refer to I.C. § 72-1010, which defines an employer as follows : “ ‘Employer,’ unless otherwise stated, includes any body of persons, corporate or unincorporated, public or private, and the legal representative of a deceased employer.”
Larson v. State, 320 P.2d 763 (Idaho 1958). “Whatever knowledge appellant then had, so did his employer within the 30-day statutory requirement. The statutory provision that "the notice to or knowledge of the occurrence of the injury on the part of the employer shall be deemed notice or knowledge, as the case may be, on…”
Indus. Indem. Co. v. Columbia Basin Steel & Iron Inc., 471 P.2d 574 (Idaho 1970). “It has been established that under I.C. § 72-1010 the general contractor is the statutory employer of a subcontractor’s employees.”
Reedy v. Trummell, 410 P.2d 654 (Idaho 1966). “I.C. § 72-1010 provides: “ ‘Employer,’ unless otherwise stated, includes any body of persons, corporate or unincorporated, public or private, and the legal representative of a deceased employer.”
Kirk v. United States, 124 F. Supp. 233 (D. Idaho 1954). “* * * ” Section 72-1010, I.C., provides as follows: “ ‘Employer,’ unless otherwise stated, includes any body of persons, corporate or unincorporated, public or private, and the legal representative of a deceased employer.”
Russell v. City of Idaho Falls, 305 P.2d 740 (Idaho 1956). “It thusly appears that the work being performed by Russell and Jorgensen relating to those particular sheep at the times in question was of intrastate classification covered by the workmen’s compensation law.”
Sines v. Brumfield, 356 P.2d 226 (Idaho 1960). “The legislature intended to require the principal, his independent contractor and any subcontractor under the independent contractor, to pay workmen’s compensation to any workman injured on the job whether employed by the owner or lessee of premises or other person who is the…”
Carter v. Carter Logging Co., 357 P.2d 660 (Idaho 1960). “The statute of 1915 in plain terms fixes the status of the parties under such conditions by *54 providing that an ‘employer’ shall include ‘a partnership using the services of another for pay.’ ” The Idaho statute defining an “employer” within the Workmen’s Compensation Law,…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.