Idaho Code
Idaho Code § 72-321 (2026)
Statutory agent of employer who has no business locale.
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IClegislature.idaho.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Statutory agent of employer who has no business locale.
If an employer maintains no place of business in this state, he shall be deemed to have appointed the secretary of state as his agent for the purpose of acceptance of service of process, or of any order, directive, decision or award of the commission or of notice of any proceeding commenced by any party pursuant to this law.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8
cases, 1951–1974 · leading case: Clevenger v. Potlatch Forests, Inc., 377 P.2d 794 (Idaho 1963).
Clevenger v. Potlatch Forests, Inc., 377 P.2d 794 (Idaho 1963). “§ 72-607 provides: "On application made by any party within four years of the date of the accident causing the injury, on the ground of a change in conditions, the board may at any time, but not oftener than once in six months, review any agreement or award, and on such review…”
Brock v. City of Boise, 516 P.2d 189 (Idaho 1973). “§ 72-404 (effective January 1, 1972); I.C. § 72-321 (repealed effective January 1, 1972).”
Scott v. Aslett Constr. Co., 452 P.2d 61 (Idaho 1968). “ment or award, and on such review may make an award ending, diminishing or increasing the compensation previously agreed upon or awarded, subject to the maximum and minimum provided in this act, and shall state its conclusions of fact and rulings of law, and immediately send to…”
Dawson v. Hartwick, 428 P.2d 480 (Idaho 1967). “a lump sum settlement pursuant to I.C. § 72-321, as amended by Session Laws 1951, ch.”
Limprecht v. Bybee, 281 P.2d 1047 (Idaho 1955). “ent or award, and on such review may make an award, ending, diminishing or increasing the compensation previously agreed upon or awarded, subject to the maximum and minimum provided in this act, and shall state its conclusions of fact and rulings of law, and immediately send to…”
Rohnert v. Amalgamated Sugar Co., 519 P.2d 432 (Idaho 1974). “In accordance with I.C. § 72-321 2 the appellant’s supplemental petition requested that all future expenses be presently awarded to him in a lump sum payment which placed the dispute over future liability in issue.”
Fountain v. TY & Jim Hom, 453 P.2d 577 (Idaho 1969). “However, appellant earnestly argues that the doctors made an honest mistake of fact, constituting constructive fraud, in appraising her condition upon which the lump sum settlement was based.”
Egus v. Triumph Min. Co., 232 P.2d 136 (Idaho 1951). “, reads as follows: “On application made by any party within four years of the date of the accident causing the injury, on the ground of a change in conditions, the board may at any time, but not oftener than once in six months, review any agreement or award, and on such review…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.