Idaho Code
Idaho Code § 72-724 (2026)
Appeal to supreme court.
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IClegislature.idaho.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Appeal to supreme court.
An appeal may be made to the supreme court by such parties from such decisions and orders of the commission and within such times and in such manner as prescribed by rule of the supreme court.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 51
cases, 1973–2017 · leading case: Deeds v. Regence Blueshield of Idaho, 141 P.3d 1079 (Idaho 2006).
Deeds v. Regence Blueshield of Idaho, 141 P.3d 1079 (Idaho 2006). “The majority relies upon this Court's construction of Idaho Code § 72-724 for the proposition that Idaho Code § 7-919 (a) only grants a right to appeal the orders or judgments listed once a final judgment has been entered.”
Houser v. S. Idaho Pipe & Steel, Inc., 649 P.2d 1197 (Idaho 1982). “§§ 72-724, -732, -425, -423, -424, -422, being the same order in which they appear in the brief, presentation of oral argument in this Court and the general course of the claimant's trial representation leave a strong suggestion that this case resembles the recent case of Sines…”
Lyons v. Indus. Special Indem. Fund, 565 P.2d 1360 (Idaho 1977). “BAKES, Justice, dissenting: As much as I agree with the factual conclusions which the Court arrives at concerning the extent of the claimant's injury, and his limited ability to obtain and perform employment, the Court is essentially performing a factfinding function which under…”
Peterson v. Farmore Pump & Irrigation, 812 P.2d 276 (Idaho 1991). “§ 72-718 provides that a final decision of the Commission may be appealed to this Court as provided by I.C. § 72-724. I.C. § 72-724 states: "[a]n appeal may be made to the Supreme Court by such parties from such decisions and orders of the commission and within such times and in…”
Troutner v. Traffic Control Co., 547 P.2d 1130 (Idaho 1976). “ention before this Court is that the record does not support the findings and conclusion of the Industrial Commission that the surety acted reasonably, and he attacks the failure of the Commission to make certain findings of fact which, Troutner alleges, would have supported a…”
Bowman v. Twin Falls Const. Co., Inc., 581 P.2d 770 (Idaho 1978). “For that reason, a broad authority was vested in the Board as an agency with expertise. Only when the Board's decisions are unsupported by " any substantial competent evidence," I.”
Ledesma v. Bergeson, 585 P.2d 965 (Idaho 1978). “” Idaho Code § 72-724 was amended in 1977 to make appeals to the Supreme Court from orders or decisions of the Industrial Commission subject to the Idaho Appellate Rules.”
Gordon v. West, 645 P.2d 334 (Idaho 1982). “The crucial issue on appeal in this case is whether there was substantial competent evidence to sustain the commission's finding that after December 24, 1977, claimant's permanent disability caused by the 1977 accident did not exceed his permanent impairment rating of 15% of the…”
Sykes v. C. P. Clare & Co., 605 P.2d 939 (Idaho 1980). “The referee concluded as a matter of law that it was the claimant's burden to present expert medical evidence of the extent and duration of disability in order to recover income benefits for disability.”
Graham v. Larry Donohoe Logging, 654 P.2d 1377 (Idaho 1982). “Sanborn (Graham) on her own behalf and that of her two children appeals. The principal issue on appeal is whether there exists substantial, competent evidence to support the finding by the Industrial Commission that there was no common-law marriage between the claimant Margaret…”
Royce v. Sw. Pipe of Idaho, 647 P.2d 746 (Idaho 1982). “Final decisions may be appealed to the Supreme Court as provided by section 72-724, Idaho Code." (Emphasis added.”
Lopez v. Amalgamated Sugar Co., 691 P.2d 1205 (Idaho 1984). “The Commission concluded an award of attorney's fees and costs was not warranted because (1) the initial doctor's reports to the surety did not state the claimant was disabled; (2) the employee failed to provide his employer with a reason for his absence; and (3) the employer…”
— Idaho Code § 72-724(2) — 5 cases
Houser v. S. Idaho Pipe & Steel, Inc., 649 P.2d 1197 (Idaho 1982). “§§ 72-724, -732, -425, -423, -424, -422, being the same order in which they appear in the brief, presentation of oral argument in this Court and the general course of the claimant's trial representation leave a strong suggestion that this case resembles the recent case of Sines…”
Sykes v. C. P. Clare & Co., 605 P.2d 939 (Idaho 1980). “The referee concluded as a matter of law that it was the claimant's burden to present expert medical evidence of the extent and duration of disability in order to recover income benefits for disability.”
Thom v. Callahan, 540 P.2d 1330 (Idaho 1975).
Dick v. Amalgamated Sugar Co., 605 P.2d 506 (Idaho 1979).
Bills v. Rich Motor Co., Inc., 526 P.2d 1095 (Idaho 1974).
— Idaho Code § 72-724(3) — 1 case
Small v. Jacklin Seed Co., 709 P.2d 114 (Idaho 1985).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.