Idaho Code
Idaho Code § 9-1501 (2026)
Written offer equivalent to tender.
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IClegislature.idaho.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Written offer equivalent to tender.
An offer in writing to pay a particular sum of money, or to deliver a written instrument or specific personal property, is, if not accepted, equivalent to the actual production and tender of the money, instrument or property.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1951–1994 · leading case: Buckley v. Orem, 730 P.2d 1037 (Idaho Ct. App. 1986).
Buckley v. Orem, 730 P.2d 1037 (Idaho Ct. App. 1986). “Idaho Code § 9-1501 provides: “An offer in writing to pay a particular sum of money, or to deliver a written instrument or specific personal property, is, if not accepted, equivalent to the actual production and tender of the money, instrument or property.”
Brinton v. Haight, 870 P.2d 677 (Idaho Ct. App. 1994). “We note that Idaho Code § 9-1501 provides an alternative method of tender: An offer in writing to pay a particular sum of money, or to deliver a written instrument or specific personal property, is, if not accepted, equivalent to the actual production and tender of the money,…”
Stockmen's Supply Co. v. Jenne, 237 P.2d 613 (Idaho 1951). “2d 901 ; Section 9-1501, I. C.; Harding v. Home Investment etc.”
Dohrman v. Tomlinson, 399 P.2d 255 (Idaho 1965). “” for the reasons that the evidence does not support it and that the tender referred to does not comply with I.C. § 9-1501, which provides: “An offer in writing to pay a particular sum of money, or to deliver a written instrument or specific personal property, is, if not…”
Sewell v. Neilsen, Monroe, Inc., 706 P.2d 81 (Idaho Ct. App. 1985). “” The letter represents an “offer in writing” to deliver deeds to the lots in question.”
Darrar v. Joseph, 419 P.2d 211 (Idaho 1966). “” I.C. § 9-1501. Defendants, in their answer and counterclaim, filed in the original action, offered to perform their agreement as to both parcels of property, and alleged they were willing and able to do so upon plaintiff’s compliance with his agreement as to title.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.