Illinois Compiled Statutes
105 ILCS 20/1 (2026)
In each public school classroom the teacher in charge shall observe a brief period of silence with the participation of all the pupils therein assembled at the opening of every school day
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IL-ILGAilga.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(105 ILCS 20/1)
(from Ch. 122, par. 771)
Sec. 1. In each public school classroom the teacher in charge shall observe a
brief period of silence with the participation of all the pupils therein
assembled at the opening of every school day. This period shall not be
conducted as a religious exercise but shall be an opportunity for silent
prayer or for silent reflection on the anticipated activities of the day.
(Source: P.A. 95-680, eff. 10-11-07.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 2008–2010 · leading case: Sherman Ex Rel. Sherman v. Koch, 623 F.3d 501 (7th Cir. 2010).
Sherman Ex Rel. Sherman v. Koch, 623 F.3d 501 (7th Cir. 2010). “105 ILCS 20/1 (emphasis added). Then-Governor Rod Blagojevich vetoed the amendment, but the Illinois legislature overrode the veto and the amendment became effective on October 11, 2007.”
Sherman v. Twp. High Sch. Dist. 214, 540 F. Supp. 2d 985 (N.D. Ill. 2008). “Plaintiff alleges that the Illinois “Silent Reflection and Student Prayer Act,” 105 ILCS 20/1 (the “Act”), is unconstitutionally vague and violates her rights under the First Amendment’s Establishment Clause.”
Sherman Ex Rel. Sherman v. Twp. High Sch. Dist. 214, 594 F. Supp. 2d 981 (N.D. Ill. 2009). “Sherman, her father and next Mend, attacks the Illinois Silent Reflection and Student Prayer Act, 105 ILCS 20/1 (the “Statute”) as unconstitutional.”
Sherman Ex Rel. Sherman v. Twp. High Sch. Dist. 214, 624 F. Supp. 2d 907 (N.D. Ill. 2008). “1 Plaintiff, *910 an atheist, seeks a preliminary injunction preventing defendants from implementing 105 ILCS 20/1, which mandates a period of silence for silent prayer or reflection at the start of each school day.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.
|