Illinois Compiled Statutes
105 ILCS 5/22-3 (2026)
Enforcement of judgments - Service of process - Costs
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IL-ILGAilga.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(105 ILCS 5/22-3)
(from Ch. 122, par. 22-3)
Sec. 22-3.
Enforcement of judgments - Service of process - Costs.
If judgment is obtained against any county board of school trustees,
trustees of schools or school board, the party entitled to the benefit
of the judgment may have enforcement thereof as
follows: the court in
which the judgment is entered or to which it may be removed by
transcript from the circuit court shall enter an order commanding the
directors, trustees and school treasurer to cause
the amount thereof with interest and costs to be paid to the party
entitled to the benefit of the judgment, out of any moneys of the
township or district unappropriated, or if there are no such moneys, out
of the first moneys applicable to the payment of the kind of services or
indebtedness for which the judgment is entered which shall be received
for the use of the township or district. The court may enforce
obedience to such order by body attachment or by mandamus,
requiring such
board to levy a tax for the payment of the judgment. All judicial
processes to enforce payment, shall be served either
on the president or the clerk of the board.
No official shall charge any costs in any action in which any school
officer, school corporation or any agent of any school fund, suing for
the recovery thereof, or any interest due thereon, is plaintiff, and is
unsuccessful in the action; nor in case the costs cannot be recovered from
the defendant by reason of his or her insolvency.
(Source: P.A. 83-346.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 2012–2012 · leading case: Innovative Modular Solutions v. Hazel Crest Sch. Dist. 152.5, 2012 IL 112052 (Ill. 2012).
Innovative Modular Solutions v. Hazel Crest Sch. Dist. 152.5, 2012 IL 112052 (Ill. 2012). “” 105 ILCS 5/22-3 (West 2008). ¶ 33 Furthermore, neither the Act nor any other statutory provision, common law authority, or constitutional principle grants the Authority the power to discharge a school district’s lawful debt.”
Modular Solutions v. Hazel Crest Sch., 965 N.E.2d 414 (Ill. 2012). “" 105 ILCS 5/22-3 (West 2008). ¶ 33 Furthermore, neither the Act nor any other statutory provision, common law authority, or constitutional principle grants the Authority the power to discharge a school district's lawful debt.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.
|