Illinois Compiled Statutes
110 ILCS 305/11 (2026)
No elected or selected member of the Board of Trustees shall receive any compensation for attending on the meetings of the Board, but they shall be reimbursed for their actual and necessary expenses while engaged in the performance of their duties
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IL-ILGAilga.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(110 ILCS 305/11)
(from Ch. 144, par. 32)
Sec. 11.
No elected or selected member of the Board of
Trustees shall receive any compensation for attending on the meetings of
the Board, but they shall be reimbursed for their actual and necessary
expenses while engaged in the performance of their duties.
Expenses necessarily incurred by any non-voting student member may, at the
discretion of the President of the Board, be provided for by advance payment to
such
member, who shall account therefor to the Board immediately after each meeting.
At all the stated and other meetings of the Board of Trustees, called by the
regent or
corresponding secretary, or any 5 members of the Board, a majority
of the
members
shall constitute a quorum, provided all the members have been
duly notified.
At each regular and special meeting that is open to the public, members of
the
public and
employees of the University shall be afforded time, subject to reasonable
constraints, to
make comments to or ask questions of the Board.
(Source: P.A. 91-715, eff. 1-1-01.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1
case (1 in the last 5 years), 2023–2023 · leading case: Serv. Employees Int'l Union, Local 73 v. Bd. of Trs. of the Univ. of Illinois (C.D. Ill. 2023).
Serv. Employees Int'l Union, Local 73 v. Bd. of Trs. of the Univ. of Illinois (C.D. Ill. 2023). “Plaintiff claims the rules Defendant (a public university board created by state statute, 110 ILCS 305/11) has adopted to govern board-meeting participation violate the First Amendment’s free-speech guarantee on their face inasmuch as they bar members of the public from speaking…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.
|