Illinois Compiled Statutes
210 ILCS 40/3 (2026)
After July 1, 1982, no person may enter into a life care contract as a provider, or as a provider extend the term of an existing life care contract except pursuant to a permit obtained in accordance with this Act
✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IL-ILGAilga.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(210 ILCS 40/3)
(from Ch. 111 1/2, par. 4160-3)
Sec. 3.
After July 1, 1982, no person may enter into a life care
contract as a provider, or as a provider extend the term of an existing life
care contract except pursuant to a permit obtained in accordance with this Act.
(Source: P.A. 82-547.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 2000–2005 · leading case: Jackim v. CC-Lake, Inc., 842 N.E.2d 1113 (Ill. App. Ct. 1st Dist. 2005).
Jackim v. CC-Lake, Inc., 842 N.E.2d 1113 (Ill. App. Ct. 1st Dist. 2005). “) 210 ILCS 40/3(h) (West 2002). We would have to disregard the legislature’s express definition of the funds at issue in order to grant the residents what they are seeking, which would be improper.”
Antler v. Classic Residence Mgmt. Ltd. P'ship, 733 N.E.2d 393 (Ill. App. Ct. 1st Dist. 2000). “See 210 ILCS 40/3 through 7 (West 1998). On the basis of the foregoing documentation, the Department of Public Health issued defendants a permit to operate as a life care facility and to enter into life care contracts.”
Jackim v. CC-Lake Opinion corrected on 02/10/06, No. 1-04-3883 Rel (Ill. App. Ct. 1st Dist. Nov. 21, 2005). “) 210 ILCS 40/3(h) (West 2002). We would have to disregard the legislature's express definition of the funds at issue in order to grant the residents what they are seeking, which would be improper.”
Antler v. Classic Residence Mgt., LP, No. 1-99-1486 (Ill. App. Ct. 1st Dist. June 30, 2000). “See 210 ILCS 40/3 through 7 (West 1998). On the basis of the foregoing documentation, the Department of Public Health issued defendants a permit to operate as a life care facility and to enter into life care contracts.”
210 ILCS 40/3(h): 2 cases
Jackim v. CC-Lake, Inc., 842 N.E.2d 1113 (Ill. App. Ct. 1st Dist. 2005). “) 210 ILCS 40/3(h) (West 2002). We would have to disregard the legislature’s express definition of the funds at issue in order to grant the residents what they are seeking, which would be improper.”
Jackim v. CC-Lake Opinion corrected on 02/10/06, No. 1-04-3883 Rel (Ill. App. Ct. 1st Dist. Nov. 21, 2005). “) 210 ILCS 40/3(h) (West 2002). We would have to disregard the legislature's express definition of the funds at issue in order to grant the residents what they are seeking, which would be improper.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.
|