Illinois Compiled Statutes

210 ILCS 45/3-603 (2026)

A resident may maintain an action under this Act for any other type of relief, including injunctive and declaratory relief, permitted by law

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(210 ILCS 45/3-603) (from Ch. 111 1/2, par. 4153-603)
    Sec. 3-603. A resident may maintain an action under this Act for any other type of relief, including injunctive and declaratory relief, permitted by law.
(Source: P.A. 81-223.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1999–2022 · leading case: Fisher v. Lexington Health Care, Inc., 722 N.E.2d 1115 (Ill. 1999).
Fisher v. Lexington Health Care, Inc., 722 N.E.2d 1115 (Ill. 1999). “Section 3-602 makes operators liable for damages to nursing home residents whose rights under the Act are violated.”
1541 North Bosworth Condo. Ass'n v. Hanna Architects, 2021 IL App (1st) 200594 (Ill. App. Ct. 2021). “, 210 ILCS 45/3-603 (West 2020) (under Nursing Home Care Act, nursing home resident “may maintain an action under this Act for any other type of relief, including injunctive and declaratory relief, permitted by law”); Fisher v.”
Sensational Four, Inc. v. Tri-Par Die & Mold Corp., 2016 IL App (2d) 150468 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016). “The supreme court interpreted section 3-603 of the Nursing Home Care Act (210 ILCS 45/3-603 (West 2006)), which provided -7- 2016 IL App (2d) 150468 that “[a] resident may maintain an action under this Act for any other type of relief, including injunctive and declaratory…”
Eads v. Heritage Enter., Inc., 787 N.E.2d 771 (Ill. 2003). “210 ILCS 45/3-603 (West 2000). The cause of action asserted by plaintiff in the case before us is premised on the foregoing statutory provisions.”
Bentson v. West Suburban Bancorp, Inc. (N.D. Ill. 2022). “2d at 502–03 (quoting 210 ILCS 45/3-603, 604). Based upon this language and the statute’s history, the Vincent Court held that common law punitive damages remained a viable remedy for “willful and wanton” violations of the statute.”
Myers v. Heritage Enter., Inc. (Ill. App. Ct. 2002). “210 ILCS 45/3-603 (West 2000). The Survival Act provides that "[i]n addition to the actions which survive by the common law, the following also survive: *** actions to recover damages for an injury to the person.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.