ILCS » Chapter 210 · Act 45

210 ILCS 45/3-701

The operation or maintenance of a facility in violation of this Act, or of the rules and regulations promulgated by the Department, is declared a public nuisance inimical to the public welfare

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(210 ILCS 45/3-701) (from Ch. 111 1/2, par. 4153-701)
    Sec. 3-701. The operation or maintenance of a facility in violation of this Act, or of the rules and regulations promulgated by the Department, is declared a public nuisance inimical to the public welfare. The Director in the name of the people of the State, through the Attorney General, or the State's Attorney of the county in which the facility is located, or in respect to any city, village or incorporated town which provides for the licensing and regulation of any or all such facilities, the Director or the mayor or president of the Board of Trustees, as the case may require, of the city, village or incorporated town, in the name of the people of the State, through the Attorney General or State's attorney of the county in which the facility is located, may, in addition to other remedies herein provided, bring action for an injunction to restrain such violation or to enjoin the future operation or maintenance of any such facility.
(Source: P.A. 81-223.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2011–2015 · leading case: Gruby v. The Department of Public Health
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Gruby v. The Department of Public Health (2015) illappct “” 210 ILCS 45/3-701 (West 2012). Therefore, we conclude that the first criterion is satisfied.”
Gruby v. The Department of Public Health (2015) illappct “” 210 ILCS 45/3-701 (West 2012). Therefore, we conclude that the first criterion is satisfied.”
Sherman West Court v. Arnold (2011) illappct “Fessenden filed a complaint against plaintiff with IDPH under the Nursing Home Care Act (210 ILCS 45/3-701 et seq. (West 2008)), alleging that plaintiff's employees did not adequately recognize the signs of the stroke or give her father adequate emergency care.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.