ILCS » Chapter 215 · Act 134
Illinois Compiled Statutes

215 ILCS 134/1 (2026)

Short title

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(215 ILCS 134/1)
    Sec. 1. Short title. This Act may be cited as the Managed Care Reform and Patient Rights Act.
(Source: P.A. 91-617, eff. 1-1-00.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 2000–2007 · leading case: Neade v. Portes, 739 N.E.2d 496 (Ill. 2000).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Neade v. Portes, 739 N.E.2d 496 (Ill. 2000). · cites it 2× “The importance of making patients aware of possible financial conflicts of interest is further reflected in the new Managed Care Reform and Patient Rights Act (215 ILCS 134/1 et seq. (West Supp.1999)), enacted during the pendency of this case, which requires health plans to…”
Bagent v. Blessing Care Corp., 862 N.E.2d 985 (Ill. 2007). “(West 2004)), the Managed Care Reform and Patient Rights Act (215 ILCS 134/1 et seq. (West 2004)), and article I, section 12, of the Illinois Constitution (Ill.”
In Re Med. Malpractice Cases Pending, 787 N.E.2d 237 (Ill. App. Ct. 2003). “Do the HLA and the MCRPRA [Medical Care Reform and Patients' Rights Act (215 ILCS 134/1 et seq. (West 2000))] conflict so as to prohibit enforcement of the HLA amendments relating to ex parte communications between hospital counsel and persons responsible for risk management…”
Szfranski v. Azaran, 337 Ill. App. 3d 1016 (Ill. App. Ct. 2003). “Do the HLA and the MCRPRA [Managed Care Reform and Patient Rights Act (215 ILCS 134/1 et seq. (West 2000))] conflict so as to prohibit enforcement of the HLA amendments relating to ex parte communications between hospital counsel and persons responsible for risk management with…”
Bagent v. Blessing Care Corp. (Ill. 2007). “(West 2004)), the Managed Care Reform and Patient Rights Act (215 ILCS 134/1 et seq. (West 2004)), and article I, section 12, of the Illinois Constitution (Ill.”
In re Med. Malpractice Cases Pending in the Law Div. (Ill. App. Ct. 2003). “Do the HLA and the MCRPRA [Medical Care Reform and Patients' Rights Act (215 ILCS 134/1 et seq. (West 2000))] conflict so as to prohibit enforcement of the HLA amendments relating to ex parte communications between hospital counsel and persons responsible for risk management…”
Neade v. Portes (Ill. 2000). “The importance of making patients aware of possible financial conflicts of interest is further reflected in the new Managed Care Reform and Patient Rights Act (215 ILCS 134/1 et seq. (West Supp. 1999)), enacted during the pendency of this case, which requires health plans to…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.