Illinois Compiled Statutes
215 ILCS 5/143.24 (2026)
Limited Nonrenewal of Automobile Insurance Policy
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IL-ILGAilga.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(215 ILCS 5/143.24)
(from Ch. 73, par. 755.24)
Sec. 143.24. Limited Nonrenewal of Automobile Insurance Policy. A policy of automobile insurance, as defined in subsection (a) of Section
143.13, may not be nonrenewed for any of the following reasons:
a. Age;
b. Sex;
c. Race;
d. Color;
e. Creed;
f. Ancestry;
g. Occupation;
h. Marital Status;
i. Employer of the insured;
j. Physical disability as defined in Section 143.24a of this Act.
(Source: P.A. 99-143, eff. 7-27-15.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2015–2021 · leading case: Kim v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 200135 (Ill. App. Ct. 2021).
Kim v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 200135 (Ill. App. Ct. 2021). “¶7 On May 9, 2012, four days before Kim filed her personal injury lawsuit against Swann, Sinson wrote to State Farm claim representative Connie O’Connor and made the following demand: “Pursuant to 215 ILCS 5/143.24(b), please disclose your insured’s policy limits.”
Roppo v. Travelers Companies, 100 F. Supp. 3d 636 (N.D. Ill. 2015). “9, 2011 Letter (asking for Block’s policy limits “[p]ursuant to 215 ILCS 5/143.24(b)”). But the letter did not include any description of the injuries or medical records, and Roppo concedes that she did not supply Travelers with that information.”
— 215 ILCS 5/143.24(b) — 2 cases
Kim v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 200135 (Ill. App. Ct. 2021). “¶7 On May 9, 2012, four days before Kim filed her personal injury lawsuit against Swann, Sinson wrote to State Farm claim representative Connie O’Connor and made the following demand: “Pursuant to 215 ILCS 5/143.24(b), please disclose your insured’s policy limits.”
Roppo v. Travelers Companies, 100 F. Supp. 3d 636 (N.D. Ill. 2015). “9, 2011 Letter (asking for Block’s policy limits “[p]ursuant to 215 ILCS 5/143.24(b)”). But the letter did not include any description of the injuries or medical records, and Roppo concedes that she did not supply Travelers with that information.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.
|