Illinois Compiled Statutes

215 ILCS 5/508.1 (2026)

(Repealed)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(215 ILCS 5/508.1) (from Ch. 73, par. 1065.55-1)
    Sec. 508.1. (Repealed).
(Source: P.A. 85-334. Repealed by P.A. 92-386, eff. 1-1-02.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1993–2002 · leading case: Safeway Ins. v. Daddono, 777 N.E.2d 693 (Ill. App. Ct. 2002).
Safeway Ins. v. Daddono, 777 N.E.2d 693 (Ill. App. Ct. 2002). · cites it 6× “On appeal, Safeway argues that the trial court erred in dismissing its complaint where the complaint adequately stated a cause of action against Daddono and Khano for violation of the Illinois Insurance Code (215 ILCS 5/508.1 (West 1996)) and breach of fiduciary duty.”
Lincoln Towers Ins. Agency, Inc. v. Boozell, 684 N.E.2d 900 (Ill. App. Ct. 1997). · cites it 6× “1 of the Illinois Insurance Code (215 ILCS 5/508.1 (West 1996)), all money received by a producer for selling or renewing insurance policies was held by the producer in a fiduciary capacity for the benefit of the insurer.”
Scott v. Assurance Co. of Am., 625 N.E.2d 439 (Ill. App. Ct. 1993). · cites it 2× “1 (West 1992)), which has stated the following at all pertinent times: "Any insurance company which delivers to any insurance producer in this State a policy or contract for insurance pursuant to the application or request of an insurance producer, authorizes such producer to…”
Safeway Ins. Co. v. Daddono (Ill. App. Ct. 2002). · cites it 5× “On appeal, Safeway argues that the trial court erred in dismissing its complaint where the complaint adequately stated a cause of action against Daddono and Khano for violation of the Illinois Insurance Code (215 ILCS 5/508.1 (West 1996)) and breach of fiduciary duty.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.