Illinois Compiled Statutes
225 ILCS 60/3 (2026)
Licensure requirement
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IL-ILGAilga.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(225 ILCS 60/3)
(from Ch. 111, par. 4400-3)
(Section scheduled to be repealed on January 1, 2027)
Sec. 3. Licensure requirement. No person shall practice medicine, or
any
of its branches, or
treat human ailments without the use of
drugs and without operative surgery, without a valid, active
license to do so, except that a physician who holds
an active license in another state or a second year resident
enrolled in a residency program accredited by the Liaison
Committee on Graduate Medical Education or the Bureau of Professional
Education of the American
Osteopathic Association
may provide medical services to patients in Illinois during
a bonafide emergency in immediate preparation for or during
interstate transit.
(Source: P.A. 98-1140, eff. 12-30-14.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1997–2025 · leading case: Berlin v. Sarah Bush Lincoln Health Ctr., 688 N.E.2d 106 (Ill. 1997).
Berlin v. Sarah Bush Lincoln Health Ctr., 688 N.E.2d 106 (Ill. 1997). “To the contrary, it has continued to adhere to the requirements that medicine can only be practiced by those who hold valid licenses from the state (225 ILCS 60/3 (West 1994)) and that only individuals can obtain such licenses (225 ILCS 60/9,11 (West 1994); 68 Ill.”
Brockett Ex Rel. Brockett v. Davis, 762 N.E.2d 513 (Ill. App. Ct. 2001). “Section 3 of the Medical Practice Act (225 ILCS 60/3 (West 1998)) provides that "[n]o person shall practice medicine, or any of its branches, or treat human ailments without the use of drugs and without operative surgery, without a valid, existing license to do so." Based on our…”
Carter-Shields, MD v. Alton Health Inst., 777 N.E.2d 948 (Ill. 2002). “See 225 ILCS 60/3 (West 1996). We concluded in Berlin that in light of the fact that the General Assembly enacted a comprehensive licensing scheme for hospitals, and thereby extended to hospitals the authority to provide medical services to the public, the corporate practice…”
Doe v. Dep't of Prof'l Reg., 793 N.E.2d 119 (Ill. App. Ct. 2003). “See 225 ILCS 60/2 (West 2000) (defining “physician” as “a person licensed under the Medical Practice Act to practice medicine in all of its branches”); 225 ILCS 60/3 (West 2000) (“No person shall practice medicine, or any of its branches,” without a valid, existing license).”
Ikpoh v. Dep't of Prof'l Reg., 789 N.E.2d 442 (Ill. App. Ct. 2003). “See 225 ILCS 60/3 (West 2000) (referring to “a valid, existing license” and “an active license”); 225 ILCS 60/38 (West 2000) (referring to a “physician licensed under this Act”); 225 ILCS 60/43 (West 2000) (referring to a license in “good standing”); 225 ILCS 60/48 (West 2000)…”
Lavery v. Dep't of Fin. & Prof'l Reg., 2025 IL 130033 (Ill. 2025). “§ 2105- 15; 225 ILCS 60/3 (West 2020); 720 ILCS 570/301 (West 2020).”
Joliet Med. Grp., Inc. v. Ensminger, 787 N.E.2d 879 (Ill. App. Ct. 2003). “225 ILCS 60/3 (West 1998). In contrast, a "medical practice," simply stated, is the physician's business.”
Holden v. Rockford Mem'l Hosp., 678 N.E.2d 342 (Ill. App. Ct. 1997). “(now codified, as amended, at 225 ILCS 60/1 (West 1994))) stated that no person shall practice medicine without a valid license (225 ILCS 60/3 (West 1992)). Starting with this premise, the legislature has then granted several exceptions where a corporation may perform…”
Brockett v. Davis Modification of September 13, 2001, opinion upon Denial of Rehearing (Ill. App. Ct. 2001). “See 225 ILCS 60/3 (West 2000). Section 3 of the Medical Practice Act (225 ILCS 60/3 (West 1998)) provides that "[n]o person shall practice medicine, or any of its branches, or treat human ailments without the use of drugs and without operative surgery, without a valid, existing…”
Khungar v. Dep't of Fin. & Prof'l Reg., 2021 IL App (1st) 200077-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2021). “” 225 ILCS 60/3, 9 (West 2018). Failure to do so subjects a medical practitioner to disciplinary action by the Department, including license suspension.”
Issa v. Illinois Dep't of Prof'l Reg., 2025 IL App (1st) 241014-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2025). “” 225 ILCS 60/3, 9 (West 2022). Failure to do so subjects a medical practitioner to disciplinary action by the Department.”
Berlin v. Sarah Bush Lincoln Health Ctr. (Ill. 1997). “To the contrary, it has continued to adhere to the requirements that medicine can only be practiced by those who hold valid licenses from the state (225 ILCS 60/3 (West 1994)) and that only individuals can obtain such licenses (225 ILCS 60/9, 11 (West 1994); 68 Ill.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.
|