Illinois Compiled Statutes
225 ILCS 95/1 (2026)
Legislative purpose
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IL-ILGAilga.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(225 ILCS 95/1)
(from Ch. 111, par. 4601)
(Section scheduled to be repealed on January 1, 2028)
Sec. 1. Legislative purpose. The practice as a physician assistant in the State of
Illinois is hereby declared to affect the public health, safety and welfare
and to be subject to regulation and control in the public interest. The
purpose and legislative intent of this Act is to encourage and promote the
more effective utilization of the skills of physicians by enabling them to
delegate certain health tasks to physician assistants where such delegation
is consistent with the health and welfare of the patient and is conducted
at the direction of and under the responsible supervision of the physician.
It is further declared to be a matter of public health and concern that
the practice as a physician assistant, as defined in this Act, merit and
receive the confidence of the public, that only qualified persons be
authorized to practice as a physician assistant in the State of Illinois.
This Act shall be liberally construed to best carry out these subjects
and purposes.
(Source: P.A. 100-453, eff. 8-25-17.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 1997–1997 · leading case: People v. Stults, 683 N.E.2d 521 (Ill. App. Ct. 1997).
People v. Stults, 683 N.E.2d 521 (Ill. App. Ct. 1997). “Finally, we note that the Physician Assistant Practice Act of 1987 (225 ILCS 95/1 et seq. (West 1996)) states that the practice of a physician assistant will enable physicians "to delegate certain health tasks to physician assistants where such delegation is consistent with the…”
People v. Stults (Ill. App. Ct. 1997). “Finally, we note that the Physician Assistant Practice Act of 1987 (225 ILCS 95/1 et seq. (West 1996)) states that the practice of a physician assistant will enable physicians "to delegate certain health tasks to physician assistants where such delegation is consistent with the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.
|