ILCS » Chapter 235 · Act 5
Illinois Compiled Statutes

235 ILCS 5/3-13 (2026)

The provisions of "The Illinois Administrative Procedure Act", as now or hereafter amended, are hereby expressly adopted and incorporated herein as though a part of this Act, and shall apply to all administrative rules and procedures of the State commission under this Act

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(235 ILCS 5/3-13) (from Ch. 43, par. 108a)
    Sec. 3-13. The provisions of "The Illinois Administrative Procedure Act", as now or hereafter amended, are hereby expressly adopted and incorporated herein as though a part of this Act, and shall apply to all administrative rules and procedures of the State commission under this Act.
(Source: P.A. 82-783.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1996–2002 · leading case: Cochrane's of Champaign, Inc. v. Illinois Liquor Control Comm'n, 673 N.E.2d 1176 (Ill. App. Ct. 1996).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Cochrane's of Champaign, Inc. v. Illinois Liquor Control Comm'n, 673 N.E.2d 1176 (Ill. App. Ct. 1996). · cites it 2× “Rather, it argues section 10-40 of the Illinois Administrative Procedure Act (Procedure Act) (5 ILCS 100/10-40 (West 1992)) applies to these proceedings through section 3-13 of the Liquor Control Act of 1934 (Liquor Act) (235 ILCS 5/3-13 (West 1992)), and the former allows…”
Gounaris v. City of Chicago (Ill. App. Ct. 2001). “235 ILCS 5/3-13 (West 1996); Laristos , 309 Ill.”
El Sauz, Inc. v. Daley (Ill. App. Ct. 2002). “" 235 ILCS 5/3-13 (West 1998). Section 10-50 of the Procedure Act provides in pertinent part as follows: "Parties or their agents appointed to receive service of process shall be notified either personally or by registered or certified mail of any decision or order.”
Laristos, Inc. v. Chicago License Appeal Comm'n (Ill. App. Ct. 1999). “235 ILCS 5/3-13 (West 1996). No similar provision applies the Procedure Act to LAC proceedings.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.