Illinois Compiled Statutes

235 ILCS 5/7-10 (2026)

A copy of the rule, regulation, order or decision of the State commission or the license appeal commission, in any proceeding before it, certified under the seal of said commission, shall be served upon each party of record to the proceeding before the commission and service upon any attorney of record for any such party shall be deemed service upon such party

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(235 ILCS 5/7-10) (from Ch. 43, par. 154)
    Sec. 7-10. A copy of the rule, regulation, order or decision of the State commission or the license appeal commission, in any proceeding before it, certified under the seal of said commission, shall be served upon each party of record to the proceeding before the commission and service upon any attorney of record for any such party shall be deemed service upon such party. Each party appearing before said commission shall enter his appearance and indicate to the commission his address for the service of a copy of any rule, regulation, order, decision or notice and the mailing of a copy of any rule, regulation or order of said commission or of any notice by said commission, in said proceeding, to said party at such address shall be deemed service thereof upon such party.
    Within 20 days after the service of any rule, regulation, order or decision of said commission upon any party to the proceeding, such party may apply for a rehearing in respect to any matters determined by said commission. If a rehearing is granted, the commission shall hold the rehearing and render a decision within 20 days from the filing of the application for rehearing with the secretary of the commission. The time for holding such rehearing and rendering a decision may be extended for a period not to exceed 30 days, for good cause shown, and by notice in writing to all parties of interest. No action for the judicial review of any decision of said commission shall be allowed unless the party commencing such action has first filed an application for a rehearing and the commission has acted upon said application. Only one rehearing may be granted by the commission on application of any one party.
(Source: P.A. 82-783.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1999–2021 · leading case: City of Chicago v. Pooh Bah Enter., Inc., 865 N.E.2d 133 (Ill. 2007).
City of Chicago v. Pooh Bah Enter., Inc., 865 N.E.2d 133 (Ill. 2007). “235 ILCS 5/7-10 (West 1996). When that petition was denied, Pooh Bah sought judicial review in the circuit court of Cook County pursuant to this state's Administrative Review Law (735 ILCS 5/3-101 et seq.”
Modrytzkji v. The City of Chicago, 2015 IL App (1st) 141874 (Ill. App. Ct. 2015). “3d 508, 515 (2002) (holding that the Liquor Control Act of 1934's (235 ILCS 5/7-10 (West 1998)) provision stating "[w]ithin 20 days after the service of any rule, regulation, order or decision *** upon any party to the proceeding, such party may apply for a rehearing in respect…”
One Eleven Food & Liquor, Inc. v. City of Chicago, 2021 IL App (1st) 200802-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2021). · cites it 5× “When reviewing a motion to dismiss, the circuit court must accept all well-pled facts in the complaint as true, as well as any reasonable inferences from those 1 Despite the Liquor Control Act of 1934 having been renumbered, the License Appeal Commission still referenced section…”
El Sauz, Inc. v. Daley (Ill. App. Ct. 2002). · cites it 4× “Anticipating a jurisdictional challenge because the petition was not filed within 20 days of the LAC's order (see 235 ILCS 5/7-10 (West 1998), the plaintiff alleged that it never received a copy of the order and that its attorney did not receive a copy of the March 15, 1999,…”
Laristos, Inc. v. Chicago License Appeal Comm'n (Ill. App. Ct. 1999). · cites it 2× “The trial court faced the question of whether the Procedure Act's notice provisions superseded the notice provisions in the earlier statutes.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.