Illinois Compiled Statutes

235 ILCS 5/7-11 (2026)

Judicial review

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(235 ILCS 5/7-11) (from Ch. 43, par. 154a)
    Sec. 7-11. Judicial review. All final administrative decisions of the State Commission under this Act shall be subject to judicial review pursuant to the provisions of the Administrative Review Law and the rules adopted pursuant thereto. Judicial review may be requested by any party in interest, including but not limited to the local liquor control commissioner. The term "administrative decision" is defined as in Section 3-101 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
(Source: P.A. 86-1279.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1999–2022 · leading case: WISAM 1, Inc. v. Illinois Liquor Control Comm'n, 2014 IL 116173 (Ill. 2014).
WISAM 1, Inc. v. Illinois Liquor Control Comm'n, 2014 IL 116173 (Ill. 2014). · cites it 2× “-5- ¶ 19 Thereafter, Sheridan Liquors filed a complaint for administrative review in the circuit court of Peoria County pursuant to the Administrative Review Law (235 ILCS 5/7-11 (West 2010); 735 ILCS 5/3-101 et seq.”
WISAM 1, Inc. v. Illinois Liquor Control Comm'n, 2014 IL 116173 (Ill. 2014). “¶ 24 Pursuant to section 7-11 of the Liquor Control Act (235 ILCS 5/7-11 (West 2010)), decisions of the Commission are subject to judicial review in accordance with the provisions of the Administrative Review Law (735 ILCS 5/3-101 et seq.”
Knoob v. The City of Carbondale, 2022 IL App (5th) 200414-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2022). “The defendants referred to the ILCC appeal of Order 03 and stated that only the ILCC had the authority to review the decisions of the Local Liquor Commission under the Liquor Control Act of 1934 (235 ILCS 5/7-11 (West 2020)), unless an administrative rule was attacked on its…”
One Eleven Food & Liquor, Inc. v. City of Chicago, 2021 IL App (1st) 200802-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2021). “See 235 ILCS 5/7-11 (West 2020). Where the Administrative Review Law has been adopted, no other equitable, common-law or statutory remedy is available to review an administrative agency’s decision.”
El Sauz, Inc. v. Daley (Ill. App. Ct. 2002). “See 235 ILCS 5/7-11 (West 1998). The January 31, 2000, order denying the LLCC's petition for rehearing provided that the parties had 35 days from the date of service of the order within which to commence an action for administrative review in the circuit court of Cook County.”
MJ Ontario, Inc. v. Daley (Ill. App. Ct. 2007). “In the instant case, the Liquor Control Act of 1934 (235 ILCS 5/7-11 (West 2002)) provides that judicial review of all final administrative decisions be pursuant to the Administrative -6- 1-04-2249 Review Law (735 ILCS 5/3-101 et seq.”
Daley v. License Appeal Comm'n (Ill. App. Ct. 1999). “" 235 ILCS 5/7-11 (West 1998). In the instant case, after the LAC remanded the case to the LLCC with instructions to impose a sanction less than revocation, the LLCC could have appealed the LAC's order or complied with it.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.