ILCS » Chapter 35 · Act 200
Illinois Compiled Statutes

35 ILCS 200/18-150 (2026)

Extension in one total

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(35 ILCS 200/18-150)
    Sec. 18-150. Extension in one total. In counties with 3,000,000 or more inhabitants, the county clerk shall, and in all other counties the county clerk may, extend on each valuation of property the sum of the taxes to be extended upon the property in one total. When collected, the taxes shall be divided among the taxing bodies levying the same in proportion to the rates as determined by the clerk, after deducting from any tax the amount or amounts, if any, ruled invalid by the final judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction, and in the event a municipality has adopted tax increment financing under Division 74.4 of Article 11 of the Illinois Municipal Code, after deducting from any tax, except from a tax levied by a township to retire bonds issued to satisfy court-ordered damages, the amount to be placed in the special tax allocation fund, and distributing the amount to be placed in the special fund to the municipal treasurer under Section 11-74.4-8 of that Act. The clerk shall certify in the collector's books the rates as determined for extension in such manner as to indicate the different taxes entering into each total. All officers dealing with such extensions, shall record them by totals. The clerk shall show in the collector's books the total tax due each taxing body as extended.
    If (i) a county clerk does not extend in one total on each valuation of property the sum of the taxes to be extended upon the property and (ii) a municipality has adopted tax increment financing under Division 74.4 of Article 11 of the Illinois Municipal Code, then the clerk may not deduct the amount to be placed in the special tax allocation fund from a tax levied by a township to retire bonds issued to satisfy court-ordered damages.
(Source: P.A. 91-190, eff. 7-20-99.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 2016–2017 · leading case: Vill. of Arlington Heights v. Pappas, 2016 IL App (1st) 151802 (Ill. App. Ct. 2017).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Vill. of Arlington Heights v. Pappas, 2016 IL App (1st) 151802 (Ill. App. Ct. 2017). · cites it 3× “35 ILCS 200/18-150 (West 2012). The property tax revenue is deposited in the taxing districts’ respective “general corporate funds” to be used for general corporate purposes.”
The Vill. of Arlington Heights v. Pappas, 2016 IL App (1st) 151802 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016). · cites it 2× “35 ILCS 200/18-150 (West 2012). The property tax revenue is deposited in the taxing districts’ respective “general corporate funds” to be used for general corporate purposes.”
In re Application of the Cnty. Collector, 2017 IL App (2d) 160483 (Ill. App. Ct. 2017). “” 35 ILCS 200/18-150 (West 2014). Pursuant to the Code, a taxing district levies taxes.”
In re Application of the Cnty. Collector, 2017 IL App (2d) 160483 (Ill. App. Ct. 2017). “” 35 ILCS 200/18-150 (West 2014). Pursuant to the Code, a taxing district levies taxes.”
In re Application of the Cnty. Collector, 2017 IL App (2d) 160483 (Ill. App. Ct. 2017). “” 35 ILCS 200/18-150 (West 2014). Pursuant to the Code, a taxing district levies taxes.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.