ILCS » Chapter 40 · Act 5
Illinois Compiled Statutes

40 ILCS 5/1-101.1 (2026)

Definitions

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(40 ILCS 5/1-101.1) (from Ch. 108 1/2, par. 1-101.1)
    Sec. 1-101.1. Definitions. For purposes of this Article, unless the context otherwise requires, the words defined in the Sections following this Section and preceding Section 1-102 shall have meanings given in those Sections.
(Source: P.A. 90-507, eff. 8-22-97.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1994–2013 · leading case: Reynolds v. The Ret. Bd. of the Firemen's Annuity & Benefit Fund of Chicago, 2013 IL App (1st) 120052 (Ill. App. Ct. 2013).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Reynolds v. The Ret. Bd. of the Firemen's Annuity & Benefit Fund of Chicago, 2013 IL App (1st) 120052 (Ill. App. Ct. 2013). “40 ILCS 5/1-101.1 (West 2010) (fiduciary defined).”
Cella v. Sanitary Dist. Employees', 639 N.E.2d 1335 (Ill. App. Ct. 1994). “1 & 1-109 (now 40 ILCS 5/1-101.1 & 1.109 (West 1992))) by failing to provide him with the highest possible level of pension benefits.”
Bd. of Trs., Vill. of Bolingbrook Police Pension Fund v. 909 Corp., F/k/a Underwood, Neuhaus & Co., Inc., a Texas Corp., James Willhite, Richard Pierson, & Robert Kolodziej, 33 F.3d 56 (7th Cir. 1994). “Judgment As Matter of Law 42 The board contends that the evidence demonstrates that it was entitled to a judgment as matter of law both on its unauthorized trading claims against Kolodziej because it never delegated to Kolodziej the authority to act as an "investment manager"…”
Rosario v. Ret. Bd. of the Annuity & Benefit Fund of the City of Chicago (Ill. App. Ct. 2008). “) JUSTICE SOUTH delivered the opinion of the court: This appeal arises from an order of the circuit court of Cook County denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and upholding defendant’s decision to deny plaintiff’s petition for credit for prior service under the…”
— 40 ILCS 5/1-101.1(c) — 1 case
Bd. of Trs., Vill. of Bolingbrook Police Pension Fund v. 909 Corp., F/k/a Underwood, Neuhaus & Co., Inc., a Texas Corp., James Willhite, Richard Pierson, & Robert Kolodziej, 33 F.3d 56 (7th Cir. 1994). “Judgment As Matter of Law 42 The board contends that the evidence demonstrates that it was entitled to a judgment as matter of law both on its unauthorized trading claims against Kolodziej because it never delegated to Kolodziej the authority to act as an "investment manager"…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.