ILCS » Chapter 40 · Act 5
Illinois Compiled Statutes

40 ILCS 5/7-220 (2026)

Administrative review

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(40 ILCS 5/7-220) (from Ch. 108 1/2, par. 7-220)
    Sec. 7-220. Administrative review. The provisions of the Administrative Review Law, and all amendments and modifications thereof and the rules adopted pursuant thereto shall apply to and govern all proceedings for the judicial review of final administrative decisions of the retirement board provided for under this Article. The term "administrative decision" is as defined in Section 3-101 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The venue for actions brought under the Administrative Review Law shall be any county in which the Board maintains an office or the county in which the member's employing participating municipality or participating instrumentality has its main office.
(Source: P.A. 96-1140, eff. 7-21-10; 97-933, eff. 8-10-12.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2007–2021 · leading case: Ultsch v. Illinois Mun. Ret. Fund, 874 N.E.2d 1 (Ill. 2007).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Ultsch v. Illinois Mun. Ret. Fund, 874 N.E.2d 1 (Ill. 2007). “" 40 ILCS 5/7-220 (West 2004). Although the Illinois Constitution grants an appeal as a matter of right from all final judgments of the circuit court (Ill.”
Chappell v. Bd. of Trs. of Illinois Mun. Ret. Fund, 2020 IL App (1st) 192255 (Ill. App. Ct. 2020). “IMRF counters, arguing that section 7-220 of the Pension Code (40 ILCS 5/7-220 (West 2018)) expressly provides that only the IMRF Board, and not its staff, can make a final administrative decision as to pension eligibility.”
Chappell v. Bd. of Trs. of Illinois Mun. Ret. Fund, 2020 IL App (1st) 192255 (Ill. App. Ct. 2021). “IMRF counters, arguing that section 7-220 of the Pension Code (40 ILCS 5/7-220 (West 2018)) expressly provides that only the IMRF Board, and not its staff, can make a final administrative decision as to pension eligibility.”
Horton v. Illinois Mun. Ret. Fund, 2020 IL App (1st) 200022-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2020). “” 40 ILCS 5/7-220 (West 2016) (Emphasis added.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.