ILCS » Chapter 405 · Act 5
Illinois Compiled Statutes

405 ILCS 5/2-102 (2026)

(a) A recipient of services shall be provided with adequate and humane care and services in the least restrictive environment, pursuant to an individual services plan

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(405 ILCS 5/2-102) (from Ch. 91 1/2, par. 2-102)
    Sec. 2-102. (a) A recipient of services shall be provided with adequate and humane care and services in the least restrictive environment, pursuant to an individual services plan. The Plan shall be formulated and periodically reviewed with the participation of the recipient to the extent feasible and the recipient's guardian, the recipient's substitute decision maker, if any, or any other individual designated in writing by the recipient. The facility shall advise the recipient of his or her right to designate a family member or other individual to participate in the formulation and review of the treatment plan. In determining whether care and services are being provided in the least restrictive environment, the facility shall consider the views of the recipient, if any, concerning the treatment being provided. The recipient's preferences regarding emergency interventions under subsection (d) of Section 2-200 shall be noted in the recipient's treatment plan.
    (a-5) If the services include the administration of electroconvulsive therapy or psychotropic medication, the physician or the physician's designee shall advise the recipient, in writing, of the side effects, risks, and benefits of the treatment, as well as alternatives to the proposed treatment, to the extent such advice is consistent with the recipient's ability to understand the information communicated. The physician shall determine and state in writing whether the recipient has the capacity to make a reasoned decision about the treatment. The physician or the physician's designee shall provide to the recipient's substitute decision maker, if any, the same written information that is required to be presented to the recipient in writing. If the recipient lacks the capacity to make a reasoned decision about the treatment, the treatment may be administered only (i) pursuant to the provisions of Section 2-107 or 2-107.1 or (ii) pursuant to a power of attorney for health care under the Powers of Attorney for Health Care Law or a declaration for mental health treatment under the Mental Health Treatment Preference Declaration Act. A surrogate decision maker, other than a court appointed guardian, under the Health Care Surrogate Act may not consent to the administration of electroconvulsive therapy or psychotropic medication. A surrogate may, however, petition for administration of such treatment pursuant to this Act. If the recipient is under guardianship and the guardian is authorized to consent to the administration of electroconvulsive therapy or psychotropic medication pursuant to subsection (c) of Section 2-107.1 of this Code, the physician shall advise the guardian in writing of the side effects and risks of the treatment, alternatives to the proposed treatment, and the risks and benefits of the treatment. A qualified professional shall be responsible for overseeing the implementation of such plan. Such care and treatment shall make reasonable accommodation of any physical disability of the recipient, including but not limited to the regular use of sign language for any hearing impaired individual for whom sign language is a primary mode of communication. If the recipient is unable to communicate effectively in English, the facility shall make reasonable efforts to provide services to the recipient in a language that the recipient understands.
    (b) A recipient of services who is an adherent or a member of any well-recognized religious denomination, the principles and tenets of which teach reliance upon services by spiritual means through prayer alone for healing by a duly accredited practitioner thereof, shall have the right to choose such services. The parent or guardian of a recipient of services who is a minor, or a guardian of a recipient of services who is not a minor, shall have the right to choose services by spiritual means through prayer for the recipient of services.
(Source: P.A. 95-172, eff. 8-14-07.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 57 cases (7 in the last 5 years), 1994–2024 · leading case: In Re John R., 792 N.E.2d 350 (Ill. App. Ct. 2003).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In Re John R., 792 N.E.2d 350 (Ill. App. Ct. 2003). · cites it 5× “The respondents argue that the State failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that the respondents lacked the capacity to make a reasoned decision about the medication because the State failed to prove that it had complied with section 2-102(a-5) of the Code (405 ILCS…”
People v. Dorothy J.N., 869 N.E.2d 413 (Ill. App. Ct. 2007). · cites it 5× “In applying the public-interest exception, we are given the opportu- nity to provide guidance and suggestions with respect to the implementation of section 2-102(a-5) of the Mental Health Code (405 ILCS 5/2-102(a-5) (West 2004)). On appeal, respondent contends the trial court's…”
In Re Vanessa K., 954 N.E.2d 885 (Ill. App. Ct. 2011). · cites it 3× “¶ 11 ANALYSIS ¶ 12 Vanessa raises three issues: whether the State failed to comply with section 2-102 of the Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities Code (Code) (405 ILCS 5/2-102(a-5) (West 2010)); whether the order allowing the involuntary administration of medication was…”
People v. Alaka W., 884 N.E.2d 241 (Ill. App. Ct. 2008). · cites it 2× “For example, section 2-102(a-5) requires that "[i]f the services include the administration of [psychotropic medication], the physician or the physician's designee shall advise the recipient, in writing, of the side effects, risks, and benefits of the treatment * * * to the…”
People v. Louis S., 838 N.E.2d 226 (Ill. App. Ct. 2005). · cites it 2× “" 405 ILCS 5/2-102(a-5) (West 2004). Before a patient can make a reasoned decision about medication, "it is first necessary to be informed about the risks and benefits of the proposed course of medicine.”
In re Craig H., 2022 IL 126256 (Ill. 2022). · cites it 2× “¶ 37 (quoting 405 ILCS 5/2-102(a-5) (West 2018)). Section 2-107.”
In re Marcus S., 2022 IL App (3d) 160710 (Ill. App. Ct. 2022). · cites it 3× “The State cannot demonstrate such incapacity without showing, inter alia, that Marcus had received written notice of the risks and benefits of, and alternatives to, each of the proposed medications, 9 as required by section 2-102(a-5) of the Code (405 ILCS 5/2-102(a-5) (West…”
In re Debra B., 2016 IL App (5th) 130573 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016). · cites it 2× “See 405 ILCS 5/2-102(a-5) (West 2012). We agree.”
People v. Linda K., 948 N.E.2d 660 (Ill. App. Ct. 2011). · cites it 3× “Section 2-102(a-5) of the Mental Health Code also provides as follows: "If the services include the administration of * * * psychotropic medication, the physician or the physician's designee shall advise the recipient, in writing, of [(1)] the side effects, [(2)] risks, and…”
In Re Ce, 641 N.E.2d 345 (Ill. 1994). “1, nevertheless chose to refuse psychotropic medication for religious reasons.”
In re Beverly B., 2017 IL App (2d) 160327 (Ill. App. Ct. 2017). · cites it 4× “She contends that the State failed to present sufficient evidence of its compliance with the mandate of section 2-102(a-5) of the Code (405 ILCS 5/2-102(a-5) (West 2016)) that the physician advise her in writing of the alternatives to the proposed treatment.”
In re Bobby F., 2012 IL App (5th) 110214 (Ill. App. Ct. 2012). · cites it 2× “1(a-5)(4)(E) (West 2010)) because the State failed to prove that it had complied with section 2-102(a-5) of the Code (405 ILCS 5/2-102(a-5) (West 2010)). ¶ 18 Section 2-102(a-5) of the Code requires a treating physician seeking to administer psychotropic medication to “advise…”
Show all 57 citing cases →
— 405 ILCS 5/2-102(a) — 15 cases
In re Craig H., 2022 IL 126256 (Ill. 2022). “¶ 37 (quoting 405 ILCS 5/2-102(a-5) (West 2018)). Section 2-107.”
Barichello v. Mcdonald, 98 F.3d 948 (7th Cir. 1996).
In re Brittany F., 2024 IL App (4th) 220788 (Ill. App. Ct. 2024).
Barichello v. McDonald, 98 F.3d 948 (7th Cir. 1996).
Christopher C. v. Christopher C., 2018 IL App (5th) 150301 (Ill. App. Ct. 2018).
— 405 ILCS 5/2-102(b) — 2 cases
In Re Ce, 641 N.E.2d 345 (Ill. 1994). “1, nevertheless chose to refuse psychotropic medication for religious reasons.”
In re Evelyn S. (Ill. App. Ct. 2003).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.