ILCS » Chapter 410 · Act 205
Illinois Compiled Statutes

410 ILCS 205/1 (2026)

This Act shall be known as and may be cited as the "Child Vision and Hearing Test Act"

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(410 ILCS 205/1) (from Ch. 23, par. 2331)
    Sec. 1. This Act shall be known as and may be cited as the "Child Vision and Hearing Test Act".
(Source: P.A. 81-174.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 2001–2005 · leading case: People v. Ward, 830 N.E.2d 556 (Ill. 2005).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
People v. Ward, 830 N.E.2d 556 (Ill. 2005). · cites it 2× “(West 2002) (Lead Poisoning Prevention Act); 410 ILCS 205/1 et seq. (West 2002) (Child Vision and Hearing Test Act); 410 ILCS 250/0.”
Wickham v. Byrne, 769 N.E.2d 1 (Ill. 2002). · cites it 2× “The petitioning grandparents argue that under the Act, the trial judge steps into the shoes of the deceased parent to protect and maintain the children's family heritage. This argument overlooks the clear constitutional directive that state interference should only occur when…”
In Re Marriage of Mehring, 755 N.E.2d 109 (Ill. App. Ct. 2001). · cites it 2× “, 410 ILCS 315/2 (West 2000) (requiring immunization of all children for diphtheria, pertussis, and tetanus); 410 ILCS 205/1 et seq. (West 2000) (requiring children to receive hearing and visual examinations).”
Wickham v. Byrne (Ill. 2002). “The petitioning grandparents argue that the under the Act, the trial judge steps into the shoes of the deceased parent to protect and maintain the children’s family heritage.”
People v. Ward (Ill. 2005). “(West 2002) (Lead Poisoning Prevention Act); 410 ILCS 205/1 et seq. (West 2002) (Child Vision and Hearing Test Act); 410 ILCS 250/0.”
In re Marriage of Mehring Opinion corrected August 23, 2001 (Ill. App. Ct. 2001). “, 410 ILCS 315/2 (West 2000) (requiring immunization of all children for diphtheria, pertussis, and tetanus); 410 ILCS 205/1 et seq. (West 2000) (requiring children to receive hearing and visual examinations).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.