ILCS » Chapter 415 · Act 15
Illinois Compiled Statutes

415 ILCS 15/1 (2026)

This Act shall be known and may be cited as the Solid Waste Planning and Recycling Act

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(415 ILCS 15/1) (from Ch. 85, par. 5951)
    Sec. 1. This Act shall be known and may be cited as the Solid Waste Planning and Recycling Act.
(Source: P.A. 85-1198.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases, 1993–2016 · leading case: Active Disposal, Inc. v. City of Darien, 635 F.3d 883 (7th Cir. 2011).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Active Disposal, Inc. v. City of Darien, 635 F.3d 883 (7th Cir. 2011). “Once certain categories of disposables are designated as recyclables, they are not meant to be put into landfills, and under § 5 a municipality does not have the power to prescribe an exclusive means for disposing of them.”
Cnty. of Kankakee v. Pollution Control Bd., 955 N.E.2d 1 (Ill. App. Ct. 2010). · cites it 2× “The Act does not authorize an inquiry into the county's prior amendment of the Plan. Rather, the adoption and amendment of a solid waste management plan are governed by the Local Solid Waste Disposal Act (415 ILCS 10/1 et seq.”
Fox Moraine, LLC v. United City of Yorkville, 2011 IL App (2d) 100017 (Ill. App. Ct. 2011). “Its plain language indicates that it is inapplicable to a proposed site in a county with a population of less than 100,000, which is exempt from the Solid Waste Planning and Recycling Act (Solid Waste Act) (415 ILCS 15/1 et. seq. (West 2006)), or in a county that has not yet…”
Worthen v. Vill. of Roxana, 253 Ill. App. 3d 378 (Ill. App. Ct. 1993). “(now 415 ILCS 15/1 et seq. (West 1992)).) Petitioners argue that the language of the Solid Waste Planning and Recycling Act precludes importation of substantial amounts of waste from outside those counties required under the Act to adopt a solid waste management plan.”
Worthen v. Vill. of Roxana, 623 N.E.2d 1058 (Ill. App. Ct. 1993). “) Petitioners argue that the language of the Solid Waste Planning and Recycling Act precludes importation of substantial amounts of waste from outside those counties required under the act to adopt a solid waste management plan. Petitioners support their proposition on the word…”
Residents Against a Polluted Env't v. Pollution Control Bd., 687 N.E.2d 552 (Ill. App. Ct. 1997). “The Act does not authorize an inquiry into the county’s prior amendment of the Plan. Rather, the adoption and amendment of a solid waste management plan are governed by the Local Solid Waste Disposal Act (415 ILCS 10/1 et seq.”
Nat'l Waste & Recycling Ass'n v. Cnty. of Cook, 2016 IL App (1st) 143694 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016). “415 ILCS 15/1 (West 2012). Particularly, although the Illinois Environmental Protection Act provides a framework for establishing a unified program for environmental protection in the state of Illinois, the General Assembly enacted the Solid Waste Act to confer upon each county…”
Nat'l Waste & Recycling Ass'n v. Cnty. of Cook, 2016 IL App (1st) 143694 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016). “415 ILCS 15/1 (West 2012). Particularly, although the Illinois Environmental Protection Act provides a framework for establishing a unified program for environmental protection in the state of Illinois, the General Assembly enacted the Solid Waste Act to confer upon each county…”
Cnty. of Kankakee v. Illinois Pollution Control Bd. (Ill. App. Ct. 2009). “(West 1994)) and the Solid Waste Planning and Recycling Act (415 ILCS 15/1 et seq. (West 1994)). Neither of these acts authorizes the Board in a siting approval appeal to review the procedures used by a county in adopting its solid waste management plan.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.