Illinois Compiled Statutes

415 ILCS 5/22.17 (2026)

Landfill post-closure care

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(415 ILCS 5/22.17) (from Ch. 111 1/2, par. 1022.17)
    Sec. 22.17. Landfill post-closure care.
    (a) The owner and operator of a sanitary landfill site that is not a site subject to subsection (a.5) or (a.10) of this Section shall monitor gas, water and settling at the completed site for a period of 15 years after the site is completed or closed, or such longer period as may be required by Board or federal regulation.
    (a.5) The owner and operator of a MSWLF unit that accepts household waste after October 8, 1993, shall conduct post-closure care at the site for a period of 30 years after the site is completed or closed, or such other period as may be approved by the Agency pursuant to Board or federal rules.
    (a.10) The owner and operator of a MSWLF unit that accepts household waste on or after October 9, 1991, but stops receiving waste before October 9, 1993, and installs final cover more than 6 months after the receipt of the final volume of waste shall conduct post-closure care at the site for a period of 30 years after the site is completed or closed, or such other period as may be approved by the Agency pursuant to Board or federal rules.
    (b) The owner and operator of a sanitary landfill that is not a facility subject to subsection (a.5) or (a.10) of this Section shall take whatever remedial action is necessary to abate any gas, water or settling problems which appear during such period of time specified in subsection (a). The owner and operator of a MSWLF unit that accepts household waste after October 8, 1993, shall take whatever remedial action is required under Sections 22.40 and 22.41 of this Act during the period of time specified in subsection (a.5) or (a.10).
    (c) Except for MSWLF units that received household waste on or after October 9, 1991, this Section does not apply to a landfill used exclusively for the disposal of waste generated at the site.
(Source: P.A. 88-496.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2003–2017 · leading case: Illinois Env't Prot. Agency v. Jersey Sanitation Corp., 336 Ill. App. 3d 582 (Ill. App. Ct. 2003).
Illinois Env't Prot. Agency v. Jersey Sanitation Corp., 336 Ill. App. 3d 582 (Ill. App. Ct. 2003). “415 ILCS 5/22.17(a) (West 2000). However, the Board found neither the Act nor the Board’s regulations in Part 807 of the Code provide any additional specificity.”
D&L Landfill, Inc. v. Illinois Pollution Control Bd., 2017 IL App (5th) 160071 (Ill. App. Ct. 2017). · cites it 2× “” 415 ILCS 5/22.17(a) (West 2012). D&L argued that this provision provides for a 15-year post-closure care period and the only way to extend the period is by Board or federal regulation.”
D&L Landfill, Inc. v. Illinois Pollution Control Bd., 2017 IL App (5th) 160071 (Ill. App. Ct. 2017). “” 415 ILCS 5/22.17(a) (West 2012). D&L argued that this provision provides for a 15- year post-closure care period and the only way to extend the period is by Board or federal regulation.”
— 415 ILCS 5/22.17(a) — 3 cases
Illinois Env't Prot. Agency v. Jersey Sanitation Corp., 336 Ill. App. 3d 582 (Ill. App. Ct. 2003). “415 ILCS 5/22.17(a) (West 2000). However, the Board found neither the Act nor the Board’s regulations in Part 807 of the Code provide any additional specificity.”
D&L Landfill, Inc. v. Illinois Pollution Control Bd., 2017 IL App (5th) 160071 (Ill. App. Ct. 2017). “” 415 ILCS 5/22.17(a) (West 2012). D&L argued that this provision provides for a 15-year post-closure care period and the only way to extend the period is by Board or federal regulation.”
D&L Landfill, Inc. v. Illinois Pollution Control Bd., 2017 IL App (5th) 160071 (Ill. App. Ct. 2017). “” 415 ILCS 5/22.17(a) (West 2012). D&L argued that this provision provides for a 15- year post-closure care period and the only way to extend the period is by Board or federal regulation.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.