ILCS » Chapter 5 · Act 100
Illinois Compiled Statutes

5 ILCS 100/10-25 (2026)

Contested cases; notice; hearing

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(5 ILCS 100/10-25) (from Ch. 127, par. 1010-25)
    Sec. 10-25. Contested cases; notice; hearing.
    (a) In a contested case, all parties shall be afforded an opportunity for a hearing after reasonable notice. The notice shall be served personally, by certified or registered mail, by email as provided by Section 10-75, or as otherwise provided by law upon the parties or their agents appointed to receive service of process and shall include the following:
        (1) A statement of the time, place, and nature of the
    
hearing.
        (2) A statement of the legal authority and
    
jurisdiction under which the hearing is to be held.
        (3) A reference to the particular Sections of the
    
substantive and procedural statutes and rules involved.
        (4) Except where a more detailed statement is
    
otherwise provided for by law, a short and plain statement of the matters asserted, the consequences of a failure to respond, and the official file or other reference number.
        (5) To the extent such information is available, the
    
names, phone numbers, email addresses, and mailing addresses of the administrative law judge or designated agency contact, the parties, and all other persons to whom the agency gives notice of the hearing unless otherwise confidential by law.
        (6) An enclosure written in, at a minimum, English,
    
Arabic, Cantonese, Gujarati, Korean, Mandarin, Polish, Russian, Spanish, Tagalog, Urdu, Ukrainian, and Vietnamese, which notifies the recipient of the ability for a party or the recipient's agent to request interpretive assistance to participate in or understand the hearing and to receive language access services for translating the contents of the notice. A request to receive a written or sight translation of the notice must be made within 7 days of service of the notice.
    (b) An opportunity shall be afforded all parties to be represented by legal counsel and to respond and present evidence and argument.
    (c) Unless precluded by law, disposition may be made of any contested case by stipulation, agreed settlement, consent order, or default.
    (d) Language access services and interpretive assistance provided in contested hearings shall be, at a minimum, in accordance with this Act, and as otherwise provided for in any law or rule governing an agency's contested hearings.
(Source: P.A. 103-1056, eff. 7-1-25.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2000–2024 · leading case: Holzrichter v. Yorath, 2013 IL App (1st) 110287 (Ill. App. Ct. 2013).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Holzrichter v. Yorath, 2013 IL App (1st) 110287 (Ill. App. Ct. 2013). · cites it 5× “¶ 136 Not every informal complaint filed with the IDPR by a private citizen develops into a “contested case” under section 10-25 of the Administrative Procedure Act (5 ILCS 100/10-25 (West 2004)). A contested case is an adjudicatory proceeding in which “all parties shall be…”
Vuagniaux v. Dep't of Prof'l Reg., 802 N.E.2d 1156 (Ill. 2003). · cites it 2× “" 5 ILCS 100/10-25(a)(4) (West 1998). No additional specificity is mandated by the Medical Practice Act itself.”
Lifenergy, LLC v. Illinois Com. Comm'n, 2021 IL App (2d) 200411 (Ill. App. Ct. 2021). · cites it 2× “That statute incorporates by reference section 10-25 of the Illinois Administrative Procedure Act (5 ILCS 100/10-25 (West 2018)). In turn, section 10-25(a)(3) of the Illinois Administrative Procedure Act provides that notice to a respondent must include “[a] reference to the…”
Morgan v. Dep't of Fin. & Prof'l Reg., 903 N.E.2d 799 (Ill. App. Ct. 2009). “He specifically contends that the Department was required to allege the specific dates of plaintiff's inappropriate conduct with J.”
In Re Abandonment of Wells Located in Illinois, 796 N.E.2d 623 (Ill. App. Ct. 2003). “5 ILCS 100/10-25 (West 2000). Section 240.”
C.Capp's LLC v. Jaffe, 2014 IL App (1st) 132696 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014). “(West 2012)), which require notice and a hearing (5 ILCS 100/10-25(a) (West 2012)). Capps argues that "[a]lthough a citizen may not be entitled to a fair hearing by the constitutional guarantee of due process, the [A]dministrative [Procedure] [A]ct *** should in some manner…”
C.Capp's LLC v. Jaffe, 2014 IL App (1st) 132696 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014). “(West 2012)), which require notice and a hearing (5 ILCS 100/10-25(a) (West 2012)). Capps argues that “[a]lthough a citizen may not be entitled to a fair hearing by the constitutional guarantee of due process, the [A]dministrative [Procedure] [A]ct *** should in some manner…”
J&J Ventures Gaming, LLC v. Illinois Gaming Bd., 2024 IL App (5th) 230255 (Ill. App. Ct. 2024). · cites it 2× “320 of the Illinois Administrative Code did not afford a hearing or discovery in violation of their procedural due process rights.”
A. Finkl & Sons Co. v. Illinois Com. Comm'n (Ill. App. Ct. 2001). “That section further states that "investigative proceedings and ratemaking cases shall be considered 'contested cases.”
S. & Cent. Illinois Laborers' Dist. Council v. Illinois Health Facilities Plan. Bd. (Ill. App. Ct. 2002). “Here, plaintiff seeks relief that, if granted, would require defendant to conduct a contested case pursuant to section 10-25 of the Illinois Administrative Procedure Act (5 ILCS 100/10-25 (West 2000)), to address plaintiff's initial allegations of the hospital's noncompliance…”
Rogy's New Generation, Inc v. Dep't of Revenue (Ill. App. Ct. 2000). “" 5 ILCS 100/10-25 (West 1998). Rogy was given such an opportunity.”
Albazzaz v. Dept. of Prof'l Reg. (Ill. App. Ct. 2000). “here was prejudicial error in not admitting other evidence offered by Albazzaz in mitigation of the sanction; whether there was prejudicial error in using an administrative warning letter as evidence in aggravation; whether the sanctions imposed on Albazzaz are unduly harsh,…”
— 5 ILCS 100/10-25(4) — 1 case
Morgan v. Dep't of Fin. & Prof'l Reg., 903 N.E.2d 799 (Ill. App. Ct. 2009). “He specifically contends that the Department was required to allege the specific dates of plaintiff's inappropriate conduct with J.”
— 5 ILCS 100/10-25(A)(3) — 1 case
Albazzaz v. Dept. of Prof'l Reg. (Ill. App. Ct. 2000). “here was prejudicial error in not admitting other evidence offered by Albazzaz in mitigation of the sanction; whether there was prejudicial error in using an administrative warning letter as evidence in aggravation; whether the sanctions imposed on Albazzaz are unduly harsh,…”
— 5 ILCS 100/10-25(a) — 5 cases
Holzrichter v. Yorath, 2013 IL App (1st) 110287 (Ill. App. Ct. 2013). “¶ 136 Not every informal complaint filed with the IDPR by a private citizen develops into a “contested case” under section 10-25 of the Administrative Procedure Act (5 ILCS 100/10-25 (West 2004)). A contested case is an adjudicatory proceeding in which “all parties shall be…”
C.Capp's LLC v. Jaffe, 2014 IL App (1st) 132696 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014). “(West 2012)), which require notice and a hearing (5 ILCS 100/10-25(a) (West 2012)). Capps argues that "[a]lthough a citizen may not be entitled to a fair hearing by the constitutional guarantee of due process, the [A]dministrative [Procedure] [A]ct *** should in some manner…”
C.Capp's LLC v. Jaffe, 2014 IL App (1st) 132696 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014). “(West 2012)), which require notice and a hearing (5 ILCS 100/10-25(a) (West 2012)). Capps argues that “[a]lthough a citizen may not be entitled to a fair hearing by the constitutional guarantee of due process, the [A]dministrative [Procedure] [A]ct *** should in some manner…”
J&J Ventures Gaming, LLC v. Illinois Gaming Bd., 2024 IL App (5th) 230255 (Ill. App. Ct. 2024). “320 of the Illinois Administrative Code did not afford a hearing or discovery in violation of their procedural due process rights.”
A. Finkl & Sons Co. v. Illinois Com. Comm'n (Ill. App. Ct. 2001). “That section further states that "investigative proceedings and ratemaking cases shall be considered 'contested cases.”
— 5 ILCS 100/10-25(a)(3) — 1 case
Lifenergy, LLC v. Illinois Com. Comm'n, 2021 IL App (2d) 200411 (Ill. App. Ct. 2021). “That statute incorporates by reference section 10-25 of the Illinois Administrative Procedure Act (5 ILCS 100/10-25 (West 2018)). In turn, section 10-25(a)(3) of the Illinois Administrative Procedure Act provides that notice to a respondent must include “[a] reference to the…”
— 5 ILCS 100/10-25(a)(4) — 1 case
Vuagniaux v. Dep't of Prof'l Reg., 802 N.E.2d 1156 (Ill. 2003). “" 5 ILCS 100/10-25(a)(4) (West 1998). No additional specificity is mandated by the Medical Practice Act itself.”
— 5 ILCS 100/10-25(c) — 1 case
Holzrichter v. Yorath, 2013 IL App (1st) 110287 (Ill. App. Ct. 2013). “¶ 136 Not every informal complaint filed with the IDPR by a private citizen develops into a “contested case” under section 10-25 of the Administrative Procedure Act (5 ILCS 100/10-25 (West 2004)). A contested case is an adjudicatory proceeding in which “all parties shall be…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.