ILCS » Chapter 5 · Act 100
Illinois Compiled Statutes

5 ILCS 100/10-50 (2026)

Decisions and orders

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(5 ILCS 100/10-50) (from Ch. 127, par. 1010-50)
    Sec. 10-50. Decisions and orders.
    (a) A final decision or order adverse to a party (other than the agency) in a contested case shall be in writing or stated in the record. A final decision shall include findings of fact and conclusions of law, separately stated. Findings of fact, if set forth in statutory language, shall be accompanied by a concise and explicit statement of the underlying facts supporting the findings. If, in accordance with agency rules, a party submitted proposed findings of fact, the decision shall include a ruling upon each proposed finding. Parties or their agents appointed to receive service of process shall be notified either personally, by registered or certified mail, by email as provided by Section 10-75, or as otherwise provided by law. Upon request a copy of the decision or order shall be delivered or mailed forthwith to each party and to his attorney of record.
    (b) All agency orders shall specify whether they are final and subject to the Administrative Review Law. Every final order shall contain a list of all parties of record to the case including the name and address of the agency or officer entering the order and the addresses of each party as known to the agency where the parties may be served with pleadings, notices, or service of process for any review or further proceedings. Every final order shall also state whether the rules of the agency require any motion or request for reconsideration and cite the rule for the requirement. The changes made by this amendatory Act of the 100th General Assembly apply to all actions filed under the Administrative Review Law on or after the effective date of this amendatory Act of the 100th General Assembly.
    (c) A decision by any agency in a contested case under this Act shall be void unless the proceedings are conducted in compliance with the provisions of this Act relating to contested cases, except to the extent those provisions are waived under Section 10-70 and except to the extent the agency has adopted its own rules for contested cases as authorized in Section 1-5.
(Source: P.A. 100-212, eff. 8-18-17; 100-880, eff. 1-1-19; 101-81, eff. 7-12-19.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 33 cases (9 in the last 5 years), 1998–2026 · leading case: Holzrichter v. Yorath, 2013 IL App (1st) 110287 (Ill. App. Ct. 2013).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Holzrichter v. Yorath, 2013 IL App (1st) 110287 (Ill. App. Ct. 2013). · cites it 2× “) so rendering any decision made up to this point in the IDPR review process void pursuant to 5 ILCS 100/10-50(c).” ¶ 63 In a memorandum opinion and order issued on March 21, 2007, the circuit court disposed of all pending matters.”
Grimm v. Calica, 2017 IL 120105 (Ill. 2018). · cites it 5× “See 5 ILCS 100/10-50(a) (West 2012). The Department disputed Grimm’s contention that its decision was unclear about the service date.”
Grimm v. Calica, 2017 IL 120105 (Ill. 2017). · cites it 5× “See 5 ILCS 100/10-50(a) (West 2012). The Department disputed Grimm’s contention that its decision was unclear about the service date.”
Nyhammer v. Basta, 2022 IL 128354 (Ill. 2022). “The appellate court then applied what it found to be the relevant provisions of the Procedure Act, finding that the Department’s decisions did not comport with the requirements for final decisions set forth in section 10- 50(a) (5 ILCS 100/10-50(a) (West 2018)) because the…”
Carver v. Nall, 714 N.E.2d 486 (Ill. 1999). “" 5 ILCS 100/10-50(b) (West 1996). The Commission's decision did not include this information.”
LUCIE B. v. Dep't of Human Servs., 966 N.E.2d 1005 (Ill. App. Ct. 2012). · cites it 2× “Plaintiff now timely appeals, contending: (1) the Department's final administrative decision failed to contain sufficient factual findings pursuant to section 10-50(a) of the Illinois Administrative Procedure Act (the Procedure Act) (5 ILCS 100/10-50(a) (West 2010)); (2) the…”
Roman v. Cook Cnty. Sheriff's Merit Bd., 2014 IL App (1st) 123308 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014). · cites it 2× “Specifically, they complain that, in violation of the Illinois Administrative Procedure Act, the Board’s decisions failed to “include findings of fact and conclusions of law, separately stated” (5 ILCS 100/10-50(a) (West 2008)) and that “[f]indings of fact, if set forth in…”
West-Howard v. The Dep't of Child. & Fam. Servs., 2013 IL App (4th) 120782 (Ill. App. Ct. 2013). · cites it 2× “5 ILCS 100/10-50(a) (West 2012). Upon request, a copy of the decision or order shall be delivered or mailed to the party and the party’s attorney of record.”
Masterton v. Vill. of Glenview Police Pension Bd., 2022 IL App (1st) 220307 (Ill. App. Ct. 2022). “” 5 ILCS 100/10-50(a) (West 2014). Thus, mailing a decision to a party starts the jurisdictional clock.”
Rochester Buckhart Action Grp. v. Young, 887 N.E.2d 49 (Ill. App. Ct. 2008). “Finally, defendant argues that even if the Act is ambiguous as to what types of construction and/or expansion projects are subject to the more strenuous section 12 notice and processing requirements, this court should give deference to the Department's determination that…”
Prate Roofing & Installations, LLC v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Corp., 2022 IL 127140 (Ill. 2022). “1 (West 2018)), which specifically requires that final decisions contain findings of fact and conclusions of law (5 ILCS 100/10-50(a) (West 2018)). Contrary to what Prate argues and what the appellate court held, we believe that CAT Express compels the opposite result in this…”
Robbin v. Dep't of State Police Merit Bd., 2014 IL App (4th) 130041 (Ill. App. Ct. 2015). “In March 2010, the court reversed the decision of the Merit Board based on its conclusion the Merit Board did not comply with the Illinois Administrative Procedure Act (5 ILCS 100/10-50 (West 2006)) because it “failed to make any findings which turn or relate to the proper…”
Show all 33 citing cases →
— 5 ILCS 100/10-50(a) — 19 cases
Grimm v. Calica, 2017 IL 120105 (Ill. 2018). “See 5 ILCS 100/10-50(a) (West 2012). The Department disputed Grimm’s contention that its decision was unclear about the service date.”
Grimm v. Calica, 2017 IL 120105 (Ill. 2017). “See 5 ILCS 100/10-50(a) (West 2012). The Department disputed Grimm’s contention that its decision was unclear about the service date.”
Nyhammer v. Basta, 2022 IL 128354 (Ill. 2022). “The appellate court then applied what it found to be the relevant provisions of the Procedure Act, finding that the Department’s decisions did not comport with the requirements for final decisions set forth in section 10- 50(a) (5 ILCS 100/10-50(a) (West 2018)) because the…”
LUCIE B. v. Dep't of Human Servs., 966 N.E.2d 1005 (Ill. App. Ct. 2012). “Plaintiff now timely appeals, contending: (1) the Department's final administrative decision failed to contain sufficient factual findings pursuant to section 10-50(a) of the Illinois Administrative Procedure Act (the Procedure Act) (5 ILCS 100/10-50(a) (West 2010)); (2) the…”
Roman v. Cook Cnty. Sheriff's Merit Bd., 2014 IL App (1st) 123308 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014). “Specifically, they complain that, in violation of the Illinois Administrative Procedure Act, the Board’s decisions failed to “include findings of fact and conclusions of law, separately stated” (5 ILCS 100/10-50(a) (West 2008)) and that “[f]indings of fact, if set forth in…”
— 5 ILCS 100/10-50(b) — 6 cases
Carver v. Nall, 714 N.E.2d 486 (Ill. 1999). “" 5 ILCS 100/10-50(b) (West 1996). The Commission's decision did not include this information.”
Grimm v. Calica, 2017 IL 120105 (Ill. 2018). “See 5 ILCS 100/10-50(a) (West 2012). The Department disputed Grimm’s contention that its decision was unclear about the service date.”
The Bd. of Educ. of Valley View Cmty. Unit Sch. Dist. No. 365-U v. Illinois State Bd. of Educ., 2013 IL App (3d) 120373 (Ill. App. Ct. 2013).
The Bd. of Educ. of Valley View Cmty. Unit Sch. Dist. No. 365-U v. Illinois State Bd. of Educ., 2013 IL App (3d) 120373 (Ill. App. Ct. 2013).
Maloney v. State Emp.'s Ret. Sys. of Illinois (Ill. App. Ct. 2006).
— 5 ILCS 100/10-50(c) — 2 cases
Holzrichter v. Yorath, 2013 IL App (1st) 110287 (Ill. App. Ct. 2013). “) so rendering any decision made up to this point in the IDPR review process void pursuant to 5 ILCS 100/10-50(c).” ¶ 63 In a memorandum opinion and order issued on March 21, 2007, the circuit court disposed of all pending matters.”
Citizens United for Responsible Energy Dev. NFP v. Illinois Com. Comm'n, 2026 IL App (5th) 250022 (Ill. App. Ct. 2026).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.