Illinois Compiled Statutes

5 ILCS 220/5 (2026)

Intergovernmental contracts

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(5 ILCS 220/5) (from Ch. 127, par. 745)
    Sec. 5. Intergovernmental contracts. Any one or more public agencies may contract with any one or more other public agencies to perform any governmental service, activity or undertaking or to combine, transfer, or exercise any powers, functions, privileges, or authority which any of the public agencies entering into the contract is authorized by law to perform, provided that such contract shall be approved by the governing bodies of each party to the contract and except where specifically and expressly prohibited by law. Such contract shall set forth fully the purposes, powers, rights, objectives and responsibilities of the contracting parties.
(Source: P.A. 91-298, eff. 7-29-99.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1999–2021 · leading case: Rajterowski v. City of Sycamore, 940 N.E.2d 682 (Ill. App. Ct. 2010).
Rajterowski v. City of Sycamore, 940 N.E.2d 682 (Ill. App. Ct. 2010). “) 5 ILCS 220/5 (West 2008). As to the first aspect of count IV, plaintiffs alleged that the Ordinance created a new source of funds to supplement the School District’s operating revenues and, as such, circumvented the School Code’s (105 ILCS 5/1 — 1 et seq.”
I-57 & Curtis, LLC v. Urbana & Champaign Sanitary Dist., 2020 IL App (4th) 190850 (Ill. App. Ct. 2020). “See 5 ILCS 220/5 (West 2018) (intergovernmental contracts).”
Dep't of Transp. Ex Rel. People v. Callender Constr. Co., 711 N.E.2d 1199 (Ill. App. Ct. 1999). · cites it 2× “5 ILCS 220/5 (West ­1996). The pur­pose the intergovernmental agree­ment between the D­epartment and Conservation was twofold.”
I-57 & Curtis, LLC v. Urbana & Champaign Sanitary Dist., 2020 IL App (4th) 190850 (Ill. App. Ct. 2021). “See 5 ILCS 220/5 (West 2018) (intergovernmental contracts).”
Rajterowski v. The City of Sycamore (Ill. App. Ct. 2010). “) 5 ILCS 220/5 (West 2008). As to the first aspect of count IV, plaintiffs alleged that the Ordinance created a new source of funds to supplement the School District's operating revenues and, as such, circumvented the 6 The term "public agency" includes units of local government…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.