Illinois Compiled Statutes
5 ILCS 220/5 (2026)
Intergovernmental contracts
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IL-ILGAilga.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(5 ILCS 220/5)
(from Ch. 127, par. 745)
Sec. 5.
Intergovernmental contracts.
Any one or more public agencies may contract with any one or more other
public agencies to perform any governmental service, activity or
undertaking or to combine, transfer, or exercise any powers, functions,
privileges, or authority which any of the public agencies entering into the
contract is
authorized by law to perform, provided that such contract shall be
approved by the governing bodies of each party
to the contract and except where specifically and expressly prohibited by
law. Such
contract shall set forth fully the purposes, powers, rights, objectives and
responsibilities of the contracting parties.
(Source: P.A. 91-298, eff. 7-29-99.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1999–2021 · leading case: Rajterowski v. City of Sycamore, 940 N.E.2d 682 (Ill. App. Ct. 2010).
Rajterowski v. City of Sycamore, 940 N.E.2d 682 (Ill. App. Ct. 2010). “) 5 ILCS 220/5 (West 2008). As to the first aspect of count IV, plaintiffs alleged that the Ordinance created a new source of funds to supplement the School District’s operating revenues and, as such, circumvented the School Code’s (105 ILCS 5/1 — 1 et seq.”
I-57 & Curtis, LLC v. Urbana & Champaign Sanitary Dist., 2020 IL App (4th) 190850 (Ill. App. Ct. 2020). “See 5 ILCS 220/5 (West 2018) (intergovernmental contracts).”
Dep't of Transp. Ex Rel. People v. Callender Constr. Co., 711 N.E.2d 1199 (Ill. App. Ct. 1999). “5 ILCS 220/5 (West 1996). The purpose the intergovernmental agreement between the Department and Conservation was twofold.”
I-57 & Curtis, LLC v. Urbana & Champaign Sanitary Dist., 2020 IL App (4th) 190850 (Ill. App. Ct. 2021). “See 5 ILCS 220/5 (West 2018) (intergovernmental contracts).”
Rajterowski v. The City of Sycamore (Ill. App. Ct. 2010). “) 5 ILCS 220/5 (West 2008). As to the first aspect of count IV, plaintiffs alleged that the Ordinance created a new source of funds to supplement the School District's operating revenues and, as such, circumvented the 6 The term "public agency" includes units of local government…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.
|