ILCS » Chapter 510 · Act 5
Illinois Compiled Statutes

510 ILCS 5/24 (2026)

Limitations

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(510 ILCS 5/24) (from Ch. 8, par. 374)
    Sec. 24. Limitations. Nothing in this Act shall be held to limit in any manner the power of any municipality or other political subdivision to prohibit animals from running at large, nor shall anything in this Act be construed to, in any manner, limit the power of any municipality or other political subdivision to further control and regulate dogs, cats or other animals in such municipality or other political subdivision provided that no regulation, policy or ordinance is specific to breed.
(Source: P.A. 101-295, eff. 8-9-19.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 2011–2015 · leading case: Cnty. of Cook v. Vill. of Bridgeview, 2014 IL App (1st) 122164 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Cnty. of Cook v. Vill. of Bridgeview, 2014 IL App (1st) 122164 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014). · cites it 2× “” 510 ILCS 5/24 (West 2010). ¶ 23 Bridgeview’s arguments concerning section 24 of the Animal Control Act turn on statutory construction.”
Missouri Pet Breeders Ass'n v. Cnty. of Cook, 106 F. Supp. 3d 908 (N.D. Ill. 2015). “” 510 ILCS 5/24; see also Cnty. of Cook v. Vill.”
Janis v. Graham, 946 N.E.2d 983 (Ill. App. Ct. 2011). “” 510 ILCS 5/24 (West 2006). Thus, according to Janis, the Village had the authority to enact section 90.”
Janis v. Graham (Ill. App. Ct. 2011). “” 510 ILCS 5/24 (West 2006). Thus, according to Janis, the Village had the authority to enact section 90.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.