ILCS » Chapter 625 · Act 45
Illinois Compiled Statutes

625 ILCS 45/2-2 (2026)

Inspection; removal; impoundment

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(625 ILCS 45/2-2) (from Ch. 95 1/2, par. 312-2)
    Sec. 2-2. Inspection; removal; impoundment.
    (a) Agents of the Department or other duly authorized police officers may board and inspect any watercraft at any time for the purpose of determining if this Act is being complied with. If the boarding officer or agent discovers any violation of this Act, he may issue a summons to the operator of the boat requiring that the operator appear before the circuit court for the county within which the offense was committed.
    (b) Every watercraft subject to this Act, if under way and upon being hailed by a designated law enforcement officer, must stop immediately and lay to.
    (c) Agents of the Department and other duly authorized police officers may enforce all federal laws and regulations which have been mutually agreed upon by the federal and state governments and are applicable to the operation of watercraft on navigable waters and federal impoundments where concurrent jurisdiction exists between the federal and state governments.
    (d) Agents of the Department and other duly authorized police officers may seize and impound, at the owner's or operator's expense, any watercraft involved in a boating accident or a violation of Section 3A-21, 5-1, 5-2, or 5-16 of this Act.
    (e) If a watercraft is causing a traffic hazard because of its position on a waterway or its physical appearance is causing the impeding of traffic, its immediate removal from the waterway by a towing service may be authorized by a law enforcement agency having jurisdiction.
    (f) Whenever a peace officer reasonably believes that a person under arrest for a violation of Section 5-1, 5-2, or 5-16 of this Act or similar provision of a local ordinance, is likely, upon release, to commit a subsequent violation of Section 5-1, 5-2, or 5-16 or a similar provision of a local ordinance, the arresting officer shall have the watercraft which the person was operating at the time of the arrest impounded for a period of not more than 12 hours after the time of the arrest. The watercraft may be released by the arresting law enforcement agency without impoundment, or may be released prior to the end of the impoundment period, however, if:
        (1) the watercraft was not owned by the person under
    
arrest, and the lawful owner requesting release possesses proof of ownership, and would not, as determined by the arresting law enforcement agency: (i) indicate a lack of ability to operate a watercraft in a safe manner, or (ii) otherwise, by operating the watercraft, be in violation of this Act; or
        (2) the watercraft is owned by the person under
    
arrest, and the person under arrest gives permission to another person to operate the watercraft, and the other person would not, as determined by the arresting law enforcement agency: (i) indicate a lack of ability to operate a watercraft in a safe manner, or (ii) otherwise, by operating the watercraft, be in violation of this Act.
(Source: P.A. 104-137, eff. 1-1-26.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2014–2014 · leading case: People v. Butorac, 2013 IL App (2d) 110953 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
People v. Butorac, 2013 IL App (2d) 110953 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014). “He was convicted of that offense after officers stopped his boat pursuant to section 2-2(a) of the Boat Registration and Safety Act (Act) (625 ILCS 45/2-2(a) (West 2010)), which permitted the officers to “board and inspect any boat at any time” to determine if the Act was being…”
— 625 ILCS 45/2-2(a) — 1 case
People v. Butorac, 2013 IL App (2d) 110953 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014). “He was convicted of that offense after officers stopped his boat pursuant to section 2-2(a) of the Boat Registration and Safety Act (Act) (625 ILCS 45/2-2(a) (West 2010)), which permitted the officers to “board and inspect any boat at any time” to determine if the Act was being…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.