Illinois Compiled Statutes
625 ILCS 5/11-100 (2026)
Definition of Administrator
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IL-ILGAilga.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(625 ILCS 5/11-100)
(from Ch. 95 1/2, par. 11-100)
Sec. 11-100.
Definition of Administrator.
For the purposes of this Chapter,
"Administrator" means the Administrator of the Illinois Safety
and Family
Financial Responsibility Law in Chapter 7 of this Code.
(Source: P.A. 89-92, eff. 7-1-96; 90-89, eff. 1-1-98.)
(625 ILCS 5/Ch. 11 Art. II heading) ARTICLE II.
OBEDIENCE TO AND EFFECT
OF TRAFFIC LAWS
|
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1999–2024 · leading case: Hudson v. City of Chicago, 881 N.E.2d 430 (Ill. App. Ct. 2007).
Hudson v. City of Chicago, 881 N.E.2d 430 (Ill. App. Ct. 2007). “Five of plaintiffs allegations accuse the officers of some violation of a general order regarding pursuit (b, c, j, and k), two allude to simple driving violations which plaintiff claims is in derogation of a general order (a and h), and some (a, e, f, and g) are only…”
People v. Grandadam, 2015 IL App (3d) 150111 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016). “” 625 ILCS 5/11-100 et seq. (West 2014). Section 11-305(a) mandates that “[t]he driver of any vehicle shall obey the instructions of any official traffic-control device applicable thereto.”
Hudson v. Basler, 2024 IL App (5th) 230331-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2024). “In the complaint, the plaintiff claimed that the defendant negligently operated his vehicle in violation of several provisions of the Illinois Vehicle Code (625 ILCS 5/11-100 et seq. (West 2018)). The plaintiff alleged, among other things, that the defendant failed to yield the…”
Bulger v. Chicago Transit Auth. (Ill. App. Ct. 2003). “In contrast, the driving standards with which drivers, including bus drivers, must comply are mandated by the various provisions of the Illinois Vehicle Code (625 ILCS 5/11-100 et seq . (West 1998)). We note that at least one provision of the Illinois Vehicle Code, section…”
Hudson v. City of Chicago (Ill. App. Ct. 2007). “1-05-2822 (a and h), and some (a, e, f, and g) are only allegations relating to violation of various rules of the road under the Illinois Vehicle Code (625 ILCS 5/11-100 et seq. (West 2004)). Most amounted to nothing more than negligence, and the addition of the word…”
People v. DOVGAN, 959 N.E.2d 230 (Ill. App. Ct. 2011). “(West 2008) (Illinois Commercial Transportation Law); 625 ILCS 5/11-100 *232 et seq. (West 2008) (the Rules of the Road); 625 ILCS 5/6-500 et seq.”
Petty v. Crowell (Ill. App. Ct. 1999). “In particular, as a violation of the Illinois Rules of the Road (625 ILCS 5/11-100 et seq. (West 1996)) is prima facie evidence of negligence (see Wallace v.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.
|