Illinois Compiled Statutes

625 ILCS 5/18c-7501 (2026)

Eminent Domain

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(625 ILCS 5/18c-7501) (from Ch. 95 1/2, par. 18c-7501)
    Sec. 18c-7501. Eminent Domain. If any rail carrier shall be unable to agree with the owner for the purchase of any real estate required for the purposes of its incorporation, or the transaction of its business, or for its depots, station buildings, machine and repair shops, or for right of way or any other lawful purpose connected with or necessary to the building, operating or running of such rail carrier, such may acquire such title in the manner that may be now or hereafter provided for by the law of eminent domain.
    A rail carrier may exercise quick take powers of eminent domain as provided in Article 20 of the Eminent Domain Act, when all of the following conditions are met: (1) the complaint for condemnation is filed within one year of the effective date of this amendatory Act of 1988; (2) the purpose of the condemnation proceeding is to acquire land for the construction of an industrial harbor railroad port; and (3) the total amount of land to be acquired for that purpose is less than 75 acres and is adjacent to the Illinois River.
(Source: P.A. 94-1055, eff. 1-1-07.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2019–2020 · leading case: BNSF Ry. Co. v. Grohne, 2019 IL App (3d) 180063 (Ill. App. Ct. 2020).
BNSF Ry. Co. v. Grohne, 2019 IL App (3d) 180063 (Ill. App. Ct. 2020). · cites it 2× “625 ILCS 5/18c-7501 (West 2014). The Code provides the power of eminent domain to any rail carrier that has been “unable to agree with the owner for the purchase of any real estate required for the purposes of [the rail carrier’s] incorporation, or the transaction of [the rail…”
BNSF Ry. Co. v. Grohne, 2019 IL App (3d) 180063 (Ill. App. Ct. 2019). · cites it 2× “625 ILCS 5/18c-7501 (West 2014). The Code provides the power of eminent - 13 ­ domain to any rail carrier that has been “unable to agree with the owner for the purchase of any real estate required for the purposes of [the rail carrier’s] incorporation, or the transaction of [the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.