ILCS » Chapter 65 · Act 5

65 ILCS 5/1-1-1

This Code shall be known and may be cited as the Illinois Municipal Code

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(65 ILCS 5/1-1-1) (from Ch. 24, par. 1-1-1)
    Sec. 1-1-1. This Code shall be known and may be cited as the Illinois Municipal Code.
(Source: Laws 1961, p. 576.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 44 cases (9 in the last 5 years), 1998–2025 · leading case: Hawthorne v. Village of Olympia Fields
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Hawthorne v. Village of Olympia Fields (2003) ill “It is true that under the Illinois Municipal Code (65 ILCS 5/1-1-1 et seq. (West 2000)), all final administrative decisions by a zoning board of appeals are subject to judicial review pursuant to the provisions of the Administrative Review Law (735 ILCS 5/3-101 et seq.”
Zander v. Carlson (2020) ill “¶7 Under the Illinois Municipal Code (65 ILCS 5/1-1-1 et seq. (West 2018)), police officers such as Zander who face removal or discharge are entitled to a hearing before the local board of fire and police commissioners unless a collective bargaining agreement between the…”
Village of Chatham v. County of Sangamon (2004) illappct “1-5 (West 2002)) of the Illinois Municipal Code (Municipal Code) (65 ILCS 5/1-1-1 through 11-152-4 (West 2002)) granted the Village zoning and building-code jurisdiction over lands subject to annexation agreements.”
Edwards v. The Addison Fire Protection District Firefighters' Pension Fund (2014) illappct “However, this court has previously considered this issue and found no conflict: “Whereas the Illinois Municipal Code (65 ILCS 5/1-1-1 et seq. (West 2002))–which governs employment of firefighters–does not specify the manner in which a municipality must prove cause for discharge…”
Cannici v. Illinois Department of Employment Security Board of Review (2021) illappct “This court explained that the analysis in Maksym had considered, in the context of eligibility to hold office, whether the mayoral candidate had abandoned his established Chicago residency because the Illinois Municipal Code (65 ILCS 5/1-1-1 et seq. (West 2010)) did not clearly…”
People Ex Rel. Klaeren v. Village of Lisle (2000) illappct “Several sections of the Municipal Code requiring a hearing were implicated because the proposed development involved a special use, a PUD, a variation, petitions for rezoning, and an annexation agreement.”
Cannici v. The Village of Melrose Park (2019) illappct “The primary issue with Cannici’s argument stems from his reliance on case law that crafted a definition for residency where the statute did not define it. In Maksym, our supreme court had no alternative but to to discern the legislature’s intent where there were no clear…”
Raintree Homes, Inc. v. Village of Long Grove (2009) illappct “Specifically, addressing the school impact fees, the trial court found that the fees were void because the Illinois Municipal Code (65 ILCS 5/1-1-1 et seq. (West 2000)) prohibits a cash donation for general operations, as opposed to school grounds.”
Muldrow v. Municipal Officers Electoral Board for the City of Markham (2019) illappct “Concerning the first objection sustained by the Board, the petitioner argued generally that neither the Election Code nor the Illinois Municipal Code (65 ILCS 5/1-1-1 et seq. (West 2016)) included the incompatible-employment restriction upon which the Board had relied to…”
Chicago Title Land Trust Company v. County of Will (2018) illappct “¶ 52 First, the majority concludes that the Village's annexation of ComEd's property was "invalid" because it was a "sham" transaction initiated by the Village for the sole purpose of facilitating the Village's subsequent annexation of the James property.”
Souza v. City of West Chicago (2021) illappct “Complaint Allegations and City Ordinance ¶4 On February 14, 2019, Souza and Posadzy filed a three-count class action complaint against defendants, alleging that plaintiffs Souza, Posadzy, and all potential class members were residential water-service customers and that the City,…”
City of Chicago v. City of Kankakee (2019) ill “(West 2016)), and the Illinois Municipal Code (65 ILCS 5/1-1-1 et seq. (West 2016)). ¶ 30 For purposes of administering ROTA, the legislature has provided IDOR with “the power to administer and enforce all the rights, powers, and duties contained in [ROTA] to collect all…”
Show all 44 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.