ILCS » Chapter 705 · Act 105
Illinois Compiled Statutes

705 ILCS 105/27.1a (2026)

(Repealed)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(705 ILCS 105/27.1a) (from Ch. 25, par. 27.1a)
    Sec. 27.1a. (Repealed).
(Source: P.A. 100-173, eff. 1-1-18. Repealed by P.A. 100-987, eff. 7-1-19.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 17 cases, 1994–2018 · leading case: People v. Hammons, 2018 IL App (4th) 160385 (Ill. App. Ct. 2018).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
People v. Hammons, 2018 IL App (4th) 160385 (Ill. App. Ct. 2018). “) 705 ILCS 105/27.1a(w)(1)(A) (West 2012). ¶ 53 The State concedes that the circuit clerk should have charged defendant only one circuit clerk fee since there was only one felony complaint.”
Halloran v. Dickerson, 679 N.E.2d 774 (Ill. App. Ct. 1997). · cites it 2× “As the record indicates, the circuit clerk, upon releasing the deposited funds to the plaintiff pursuant to court order in December 1995, levied a standard 2.”
People v. Smith, 2014 IL App (4th) 121118 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014). “705 ILCS 105/27.1a(w)(1)(G) (West 2008). The State counters the clerk imposed the $75 fee as a result of filing a postconviction petition and not a motion to reconsider.”
People v. Folks, 943 N.E.2d 1128 (Ill. App. Ct. 2010). “3a(1) (West 2008) (document-storage fee; the county board may require the circuit clerk to collect a document fee to be charged and collected by the clerk of the court); 705 ILCS 105/27.1a (West 2008) (circuit clerk fee; providing that “the clerk of the circuit court must charge…”
People v. Heller, 2017 IL App (4th) 140658 (Ill. App. Ct. 2017). “1a of the Clerk of Courts Act (705 ILCS 105/27.1a (West 2014)) pro- vides the fee schedule “of the clerks of the circuit court in all counties having a population of not - 17 - more than 500,000 inhabitants.”
People v. O'Laughlin, 2012 IL App (4th) 110018 (Ill. App. Ct. 2012). “¶ 25 The parties did not argue the circuit clerk erred in imposing the following charges: (1) $115 “Clerk” fee (705 ILCS 105/27.1a(w)(1)(A), (F) (West 2010)); (2) $15 “Automation” fee (705 ILCS 105/27.”
People v. Rowell, 874 N.E.2d 553 (Ill. App. Ct. 2006). “" 705 ILCS 105/27.1a(w)(1) (West 2004). The costs, therefore, are incurred from the initial filing through the conviction and are not assessed until the defendant is convicted.”
People v. Heller, 2017 IL App (4th) 140658 (Ill. App. Ct. 2017). “1a of the Clerk of Courts Act (705 ILCS 105/27.1a (West 2014)) provides the fee schedule “of the clerks of the circuit court in all counties having a population of not more than 500,000 inhabitants.”
People v. Breeden, 2014 IL App (4th) 121049 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014). · cites it 5× “1a(w)(1) (705 ILCS 105/27.1a(w)(1) (West 2008)), instead of reimbursing an incurred cost in a particular prosecution, intends to apply a rough and ready sense of fairness in distributing the burden of financing the circuit clerk’s office.”
People v. Carter, 2016 IL App (3d) 140196 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016). “¶ 60 We find that the remaining assessments, which total $197, were fees properly imposed by the circuit clerk: (1) the $100 clerk fee (705 ILCS 105/27.1a(w)(1)(A) (West 2012)); (2) the $30 State’s Attorney fee and $10 preliminary hearing fee, for a total of $40 (55 ILCS…”
People v. Smith, 2014 IL App (4th) 121118 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014). “705 ILCS 105/27.1a(w)(1)(G) (West 2008). The State counters the clerk imposed the $75 fee as a result of filing a postconviction petition and not a motion to reconsider.”
People v. Johnson, 2015 IL App (3d) 140364 (Ill. App. Ct. 2015). “Larue, 2014 IL App (4th) 120595 , ¶ 66 Cost (based on 705 ILCS 105/27.1a(w) 180,000- 500,000 CF= $40-$100 size of 500,000-3,000,000 705 ILCS 105/27.”
Show all 17 citing cases →
— 705 ILCS 105/27.1a(bb)(1) — 1 case
Halloran v. Dickerson, 679 N.E.2d 774 (Ill. App. Ct. 1997). “As the record indicates, the circuit clerk, upon releasing the deposited funds to the plaintiff pursuant to court order in December 1995, levied a standard 2.”
— 705 ILCS 105/27.1a(bb)(l) — 1 case
Halloran v. Dickerson, 679 N.E.2d 774 (Ill. App. Ct. 1997). “As the record indicates, the circuit clerk, upon releasing the deposited funds to the plaintiff pursuant to court order in December 1995, levied a standard 2.”
— 705 ILCS 105/27.1a(w) — 1 case
People v. Johnson, 2015 IL App (3d) 140364 (Ill. App. Ct. 2015). “Larue, 2014 IL App (4th) 120595 , ¶ 66 Cost (based on 705 ILCS 105/27.1a(w) 180,000- 500,000 CF= $40-$100 size of 500,000-3,000,000 705 ILCS 105/27.”
— 705 ILCS 105/27.1a(w)(1) — 4 cases
People v. Rowell, 874 N.E.2d 553 (Ill. App. Ct. 2006). “" 705 ILCS 105/27.1a(w)(1) (West 2004). The costs, therefore, are incurred from the initial filing through the conviction and are not assessed until the defendant is convicted.”
People v. Breeden, 2014 IL App (4th) 121049 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014). “1a(w)(1) (705 ILCS 105/27.1a(w)(1) (West 2008)), instead of reimbursing an incurred cost in a particular prosecution, intends to apply a rough and ready sense of fairness in distributing the burden of financing the circuit clerk’s office.”
People v. Rowell (Ill. App. Ct. 2006).
People v. Breeden, 2014 IL App (4th) 121049 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014).
— 705 ILCS 105/27.1a(w)(1)(A) — 6 cases
People v. Hammons, 2018 IL App (4th) 160385 (Ill. App. Ct. 2018). “) 705 ILCS 105/27.1a(w)(1)(A) (West 2012). ¶ 53 The State concedes that the circuit clerk should have charged defendant only one circuit clerk fee since there was only one felony complaint.”
People v. O'Laughlin, 2012 IL App (4th) 110018 (Ill. App. Ct. 2012). “¶ 25 The parties did not argue the circuit clerk erred in imposing the following charges: (1) $115 “Clerk” fee (705 ILCS 105/27.1a(w)(1)(A), (F) (West 2010)); (2) $15 “Automation” fee (705 ILCS 105/27.”
People v. Carter, 2016 IL App (3d) 140196 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016). “¶ 60 We find that the remaining assessments, which total $197, were fees properly imposed by the circuit clerk: (1) the $100 clerk fee (705 ILCS 105/27.1a(w)(1)(A) (West 2012)); (2) the $30 State’s Attorney fee and $10 preliminary hearing fee, for a total of $40 (55 ILCS…”
People v. Breeden, 2014 IL App (4th) 121049 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014). “1a(w)(1) (705 ILCS 105/27.1a(w)(1) (West 2008)), instead of reimbursing an incurred cost in a particular prosecution, intends to apply a rough and ready sense of fairness in distributing the burden of financing the circuit clerk’s office.”
People v. Carter, 2016 IL App (3d) 140196 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016).
— 705 ILCS 105/27.1a(w)(1)(G) — 2 cases
People v. Smith, 2014 IL App (4th) 121118 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014). “705 ILCS 105/27.1a(w)(1)(G) (West 2008). The State counters the clerk imposed the $75 fee as a result of filing a postconviction petition and not a motion to reconsider.”
People v. Smith, 2014 IL App (4th) 121118 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014). “705 ILCS 105/27.1a(w)(1)(G) (West 2008). The State counters the clerk imposed the $75 fee as a result of filing a postconviction petition and not a motion to reconsider.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.