ILCS » Chapter 705 · Act 405

705 ILCS 405/5-125

Concurrent jurisdiction

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(705 ILCS 405/5-125)
    Sec. 5-125. Concurrent jurisdiction. Any minor alleged to have violated a traffic law, a conservation offense, or a municipal or county ordinance, may be prosecuted for the violation and if found guilty punished under any statute or ordinance relating to the violation, without reference to the procedures set out in this Article, except that:
        (1) any detention, must be in compliance with this
    
Article; and
        (2) the confidentiality of records provisions in Part
    
9 of this Article shall apply to any law enforcement and court records relating to prosecution of a minor under 18 years of age for a municipal or county ordinance violation or a violation of subsection (a) of Section 4 of the Cannabis Control Act or subsection (c) of Section 3.5 of the Drug Paraphernalia Control Act; except that these confidentiality provisions shall not apply to or affect any proceeding to adjudicate the violation.
    For the purpose of this Section, "traffic violation" shall include a violation of Section 9-3 of the Criminal Code of 1961 or the Criminal Code of 2012 relating to the offense of reckless homicide, Section 11-501 of the Illinois Vehicle Code, or any similar county or municipal ordinance.
(Source: P.A. 104-325, eff. 1-1-26.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 2002–2018 · leading case: City of Urbana v. Andrew N.B.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
City of Urbana v. Andrew N.B. (2004) ill · cites it 4× “" The court then found Andrew in contempt for violating the terms of his court supervision and sentenced him to 12 months' probation and 180 days' detention—eight days to be served immediately, and the remainder subject to remission.”
People v. Markley (2013) illappct · cites it 3× “” 705 ILCS 405/5-125 (West 2010). This version of the statute became effective on January 1, 1999.”
City of Champaign v. Montrell D.H. (2003) illappct · cites it 4× “On appeal, defendant argues section 5-125 of the Juvenile Court Act of 1987 (Act) (705 ILCS 405/5-125 (West 2000)) violates his equal protection and due process rights.”
People v. Rich (2011) illappct “705 ILCS 405/5-125 (West 2008). -5- ¶ 13 We note that the State explicitly asks that we consider only whether dismissal of the second superseding indictment, filed after defendant turned 21, was proper.”
People v. M.R. (2018) illappct · cites it 3× “¶ 1 At issue in these consolidated appeals is whether possession of a stolen vehicle ( 625 ILCS 5/4-103(a)(1) (West 2016) ) is a violation of a traffic law, such that a minor accused of committing that *621 offense may be tried as an adult pursuant to section 5-125 of the…”
City of Urbana v. Andrew N.B. (2002) illappct · cites it 3× “See 705 ILCS 405/5-125 (West 2000). Defendant appeals, arguing (1) section 5-125 violated his right to equal protection and due process, (2) the city should have filed its petition for contempt as a new criminal case, and (3) the sentence is too severe, considering his age and…”
In Re MW (2009) ill “" See 705 ILCS 405/5-125, 5-130 (West 2004). Neither of these provisions are implicated in this case.”
People v. Rich (2011) illappct “720 ILCS 5/12-14(b)(i) (West 2008); 730 ILCS 5/5-5-3(c)(2)(C), 5-8-1(a)(3), 5-8-4(a)(ii) (West 2008).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.