Illinois Compiled Statutes
705 ILCS 405/5-620 (2026)
Findings
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IL-ILGAilga.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(705 ILCS 405/5-620)
Sec. 5-620. Findings. After hearing the evidence, the court shall make and note in the minutes of
the proceeding a finding of whether or not the minor is guilty. If it finds
that the minor is not guilty, the court shall order the petition dismissed and
the minor discharged from any detention or restriction previously ordered in
such proceeding. If the court finds that the minor is guilty, the court shall
then set a time for a sentencing hearing to be conducted under Section 5-705 at
which hearing the court shall determine whether it is in the best interests of
the minor and the public that the minor be made a ward of the court. To assist
the court in making this and other determinations at the sentencing hearing,
the court may order that an investigation be conducted and a social
investigation report be prepared.
(Source: P.A. 103-22, eff. 8-8-23.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2002–2025 · leading case: In re Jonathon C.B., 2011 IL 107750 (Ill. 2011).
In re Jonathon C.B., 2011 IL 107750 (Ill. 2011). “Moreover, the amendments to the Act changed the terminology used concerning delinquency proceedings, so that juvenile proceedings are called “trials” (705 ILCS 405/5-105(17) (West 2006)), that result in “findings of guilt” (705 ILCS 405/5-620 (West 2006)), leading to a…”
In Re Justin MB, 787 N.E.2d 823 (Ill. 2003). “315) to determine whether the requirement of section 5-620 of the Juvenile Court Act of 1987(Act) (705 ILCS 405/5-620 (West 1998)) that the court make a notation of a finding of guilt is jurisdictional in nature.”
People Ex Rel. Devine v. Stralka, 877 N.E.2d 416 (Ill. 2007). “705 ILCS 405/5-620 (West 2004). The second stage is where the court decides whether or not to adjudicate the minor a ward of the court.”
In Re Jonathon CB, 958 N.E.2d 227 (Ill. 2011). “Moreover, the amendments to the Act changed the terminology used concerning delinquency proceedings, so that juvenile proceedings are called "trials" (705 ILCS 405/5-105(17) (West 2006)), that result in "findings of guilt" (705 ILCS 405/5-620 (West 2006)), leading to a…”
In Re Samantha, 917 N.E.2d 487 (Ill. 2009). “705 ILCS 405/5-620 (West 2004); Stralka, 226 Ill.”
In re Nasie M., 2015 IL App (1st) 151678 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016). “705 ILCS 405/5-620 (West 2012); Samantha V.”
In Re Dd, 819 N.E.2d 300 (Ill. 2004). “" 705 ILCS 405/5-620 (West 1998). "[I]f [the minor] is * * * made a ward of the court, the court * * * determine[s] the proper disposition best serving the interests of the minor and the public.”
In Re Oh, 768 N.E.2d 799 (Ill. App. Ct. 2002). “The court's sentencing options "in respect to wards of the court" are set out in section 5-710 and they include, in relevant part: "(a) * * * (i) put on probation or conditional discharge and released to his or her parents, guardian or legal custodian* * *[or] * * * (iv) placed…”
People v. Jonathan C.B., 898 N.E.2d 252 (Ill. App. Ct. 2008). “) 705 ILCS 405/5-620 (West 1998). If the court finds the minor 'guilty,' the cause then proceeds to a 'sentencing hear- ing,' where it is determined whether or not it is in the best interests of the minor or the public that he be made a ward of the court, with the possibility…”
In re G.A.T., 2017 IL App (3d) 160702 (Ill. App. Ct. 2017). “See 705 ILCS 405/5-620 (West 2012) (“After hearing the evidence, the court shall make *** a finding of whether or not the minor is guilty.”
In re G.A.T., 2017 IL App (3d) 160702 (Ill. App. Ct. 2017). “See 705 ILCS 405/5-620 (West 2012) (“After hearing the evidence, the court shall make *** a finding of whether or not the minor is guilty.”
In Re Cb, 898 N.E.2d 252 (Ill. App. Ct. 2008). “) 705 ILCS 405/5-620 (West 1998). If the court finds the minor `guilty,' the cause then proceeds to a `sentencing hearing,' where it is determined whether or not it is in the best interests of the minor or the public that he be made a ward of the court, with the possibility that…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.
|