ILCS » Chapter 705 · Act 95
Illinois Compiled Statutes

705 ILCS 95/25 (2026)

Statutory Court Fee Task Force

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(705 ILCS 95/25)
    Sec. 25. Statutory Court Fee Task Force.
    (a) There is hereby created the Statutory Court Fee Task Force. The purpose of the Task Force is to conduct a thorough review of the various statutory fees imposed or assessed on criminal defendants and civil litigants.
    (b) The Task Force shall consist of 15 members, appointed as follows: one each by the Speaker of the House of Representatives, the Minority Leader of the House of Representatives, the President of the Senate, and the Minority Leader of the Senate; 2 by the association representing circuit court clerks; 2 by the Governor, and 7 by the Supreme Court.
    (c) At the direction of the Supreme Court, the Administrative Office of the Illinois Courts shall provide administrative support to the Task Force.
    (d) The Task Force shall submit a report containing its findings and any recommendations to the Supreme Court and the General Assembly by June 1, 2016.
(Source: P.A. 98-351, eff. 8-15-13; 98-763, eff. 7-16-14.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2018–2019 · leading case: People v. Vara, 2018 IL 121823 (Ill. 2018).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
People v. Vara, 2018 IL 121823 (Ill. 2018). “¶ 39 Recognizing these problems, the legislature, through the Access to Justice Act ( 705 ILCS 95/25 (West 2014) ), created the Statutory Court Fee Task Force, composed of members appointed by representatives of all three branches of Illinois government and both political…”
People v. Clark, 2018 IL 122495 (Ill. 2019). “705 ILCS 95/25 (West 2014). This task force was composed of members representing all three branches of Illinois government.”
People v. Clark, 2018 IL 122495 (Ill. 2018). “705 ILCS 95/25 (West 2014). This task force was composed of members representing all three branches of Illinois government.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.